| Great show and performance | |
| Posted by: | PlayStu (playbilstu@aol.com) 03:45 pm EST 12/06/13 |
|
| |
| I had my doubts that Ms Underwood could never pull off the role as Maria. After all,no one replaces Ms Andrews. I have to give credit to Carrie and the cast and crew. It was done beautifully. This undertaking is completely out of Carries comfort zone. How many singers would even attempt to do this. Lets give credit where credit is due. Too small nit picking. Lets not forget when Ms Lansbury was going to do Gypsy. Or Pearl Baily taking over the role of Dolly. Carrie and company- great job! | |
| reply to this message | | |
| huh? | |
| Posted by: | Chazwaza 10:05 pm EST 12/06/13 |
| In reply to: | Great show and performance - PlayStu 03:45 pm EST 12/06/13 |
|
| |
| Can you please explain how you can compare Lansbury doing Gypsy or Bailey doing Dolly to Underwood… I just don't understand. | |
| reply to this message | | |
| re: Great show and performance | |
| Posted by: | Chromolume 03:48 pm EST 12/06/13 |
| In reply to: | Great show and performance - PlayStu 03:45 pm EST 12/06/13 |
|
| |
| Let's not forget when Ms Lansbury was going to do Gypsy. Or Pearl Bailey taking over the role of Dolly. Yes - but they had the right chops to actually do the roles. I think we're all in agreement that Underwood doesn't. I don't think your comparisons make any real sense. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Great show and performance | |
| Posted by: | TGWW 04:09 pm EST 12/06/13 |
| In reply to: | re: Great show and performance - Chromolume 03:48 pm EST 12/06/13 |
|
| |
| But one doesn't know if they have the right chops if one doesn't have the balls to try. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Great show and performance | |
| Posted by: | bradmurf 09:48 pm EST 12/06/13 |
| In reply to: | re: Great show and performance - TGWW 04:09 pm EST 12/06/13 |
|
| |
| So we all have to suffer through a three-hour audition from an American Idol contestant (or winner, whatever), who wants to see if she has balls. Thanks. I'll pass next time. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Great show and performance | |
| Posted by: | TGWW 10:27 pm EST 12/06/13 |
| In reply to: | re: Great show and performance - bradmurf 09:48 pm EST 12/06/13 |
|
| |
| Suffer? I'm sorry, did I miss where it was mandatory viewing? If you are too stupid to change the channel if you weren't enjoying it, yeah, you deserved to suffer, But to tell an a artist not to try and grow because YOU might suffer, well that's just laughable. Pssstt, Carrie Underwood starred as Maria last night in "The Sound Of Music Live!" and the world is still turning. Imagine that. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Great show and performance | |
| Posted by: | Chromolume 06:59 pm EST 12/06/13 |
| In reply to: | re: Great show and performance - TGWW 04:09 pm EST 12/06/13 |
|
| |
| I'm defining "chops" in this case as not really being talent, but being experience/training/etc. True, Underwood the "rookie" could have surprised us with an untapped acting talent that we wouldn't have expected. But...she doesn't have those chops, and we knew she didn't. Add to that the fact that it's a supremely iconic role, and the performance is being telecast live - there was an incredible amount of pressure on Underwood to deliver - understood. I don't envy her in the least. But, this is exactly the kind of situation where experience and training can help overcome the pressure - that know-how on how to carry a stage performance - something, again, that Lansbury and Bailey had plenty of experience with. THEY weren't doing it on talent alone, and it should have been clear that it was going to be a long shot for Underwood to pull all aspects of this gig off. It could have happened, sure - anything can, lol. But I think we all know that realistically that was one big gamble. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Great show and performance | |
| Posted by: | LegitOnce 12:31 am EST 12/07/13 |
| In reply to: | re: Great show and performance - Chromolume 06:59 pm EST 12/06/13 |
|
| |
| Lansbury didn't have much in the way of "know-how on how to carry a stage performance" when she did Mame, and she had never sung in any professional capacity before. That was a huge risk that paid off enormously well. But it might have ended up an only-okay experience, and I don't think anyone was sure which of the two it would be before the show opened. So taking a gamble on Lansbury was a good idea, and on Underwood a bad idea, based on what else besides hindsight? | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Great show and performance | |
| Posted by: | will42 04:32 am EST 12/07/13 |
| In reply to: | re: Great show and performance - LegitOnce 12:31 am EST 12/07/13 |
|
| |
| Angela Lansbury has been a train singer her whole professional career. She sang at the Samovar Club in Montreal, at the age of 16 after being evacuated from London. While she was dubbed in some of her MGM films, she did her own singing in The Picture of Dorian Gray (1945), Till the Clouds Roll By (1947), and A Lawless Street (1955). As for her stage career before Mame she has appeared in Broadway’s Hotel Paradiso (1957), A Taste of Honey (1960), and of course Anyone Can Whistle (1964). | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Great show and performance | |
| Posted by: | Chromolume 12:40 am EST 12/07/13 |
| In reply to: | re: Great show and performance - LegitOnce 12:31 am EST 12/07/13 |
|
| |
| and she had never sung in any professional capacity before. Anyone Can Whistle was 2 years prior to Mame (the show may not have been a success, but it was a big leading role with lots of singing), and she had also sung in some MGM films (The Harvey Girls, Till The Clouds Roll By...). Those weren't professional?? | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Great show and performance | |
| Posted by: | LegitOnce 12:45 am EST 12/07/13 |
| In reply to: | re: Great show and performance - Chromolume 12:40 am EST 12/07/13 |
|
| |
| She was dubbed in the Metro films, but, yes, of course Anyone Can Whistle. I am that one guy who wasn't at the closing night performance! Even with Anyone Can Whistle, though, Lansbury carrying a big Broadway show was a big risk. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Great show and performance | |
| Posted by: | Chromolume 12:47 am EST 12/07/13 |
| In reply to: | re: Great show and performance - LegitOnce 12:45 am EST 12/07/13 |
|
| |
| Ah - if she was dubbed in the films, I wasn't aware of that. ;-) | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Great show and performance | |
| Posted by: | LegitOnce 01:00 am EST 12/07/13 |
| In reply to: | re: Great show and performance - Chromolume 12:47 am EST 12/07/13 |
|
| |
| I'm relying on my memory again, but I think I heard Lansbury say in an interview once that she (like most everyone else) was dubbed in her Metro musical numbers. Certainly her song in The Harvey Girls doesn't sound anything like the Lansbury belt we know from her 1960s and 1970s work. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Great show and performance | |
| Posted by: | PlayStu (playbilstu@aol.com) 03:53 pm EST 12/06/13 |
| In reply to: | re: Great show and performance - Chromolume 03:48 pm EST 12/06/13 |
|
| |
| I thought that Underwood sang the songs beautifully. Too each his own I guess. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Great show and performance | |
| Posted by: | mermaniac 01:20 am EST 12/07/13 |
| In reply to: | re: Great show and performance - PlayStu 03:53 pm EST 12/06/13 |
|
| |
| UH ---- That's TO each his own !!! No 2 ways about THAT !!! | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Great show and performance | |
| Posted by: | Zelgo 04:05 pm EST 12/06/13 |
| In reply to: | re: Great show and performance - PlayStu 03:53 pm EST 12/06/13 |
|
| |
| I, on the other hand, thought her voice was so boring. I wouldn't pick her out to have been a music star at all. Julie Andrews has ruined that part for everyone else. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Great show and performance | |
| Posted by: | LegitOnce 12:35 am EST 12/07/13 |
| In reply to: | re: Great show and performance - Zelgo 04:05 pm EST 12/06/13 |
|
| |
| Julie Andrews never sang the part on stage. You might as well say that Mitzi Gaynor and Rossano Brazzi have "ruined" South Pacific. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Great show and performance | |
| Posted by: | Chromolume 12:42 am EST 12/07/13 |
| In reply to: | re: Great show and performance - LegitOnce 12:35 am EST 12/07/13 |
|
| |
| Yes, but I would wager that more people have experienced Julie Andrews in the role over the years than those who saw martin in the original run. THAT's the point. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Great show and performance | |
| Posted by: | PlayStu (PLAYBILSTU@AOL.COM) 03:55 pm EST 12/06/13 |
| In reply to: | re: Great show and performance - PlayStu 03:53 pm EST 12/06/13 |
|
| |
| LOVED THE SETS BY THE WAY | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Great show and performance | |
| Posted by: | Chromolume 03:55 pm EST 12/06/13 |
| In reply to: | re: Great show and performance - PlayStu 03:53 pm EST 12/06/13 |
|
| |
| It would seem that no matter what people thought of her singing, the fact that she is not an actress was not lost on anyone. But Bailey and Lansbury had the acting chops AND the singing chops to take on the roles you mentioned. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Great show and performance | |
| Posted by: | PlayStu (playbilstu@aol.com) 03:56 pm EST 12/06/13 |
| In reply to: | re: Great show and performance - Chromolume 03:55 pm EST 12/06/13 |
|
| |
| They sure did. No comparsion | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
All That Chat is intended for the discussion of
theatre news and opinion
subject to the terms and conditions of the Terms of Service. (Please take all off-topic discussion to private email.)
Please direct technical questions/comments to webmaster@talkinbroadway.com and policy questions to TBAdmin@talkinbroadway.com.
[ Home | On the Rialto | The Siegel Column | E-Opinions | Cabaret | Tony Awards | Book Reviews | Great White Wayback Machine ]
[ Broadway Reviews | Barbara and Scott: The Two of Clubs | Sound Advice | Restaurant Revue | Off Broadway | Funding Talkin' Broadway ]
[ Broadway 101 | Spotlight On | Talkin' Broadway | On the Boards | Regional | Talk to Us! | Search Talkin' Broadway ]
Terms of Service
[ © 1997 - 2013 www.TalkinBroadway.com, Inc. ]
Time to render: 0.898016 seconds.