HOME ALL THAT CHAT ATC WEST COAST SHOPPIN' RUSH BOARD FAQS

LOGIN REGISTER SEARCH THREADED MODE E-OPINIONS

not logged in

Threaded Order | Chronological Order

re: SOM THING GOOD

Posted by: hugoP 12:46 am EST 12/07/13
In reply to: re: SOM THING GOOD - PlayWiz 12:29 am EST 12/07/13

I think I am in the ATC minority in that I don't feel Carrie Underwood was a ridiculous notion. She has a wonderful voice and has a lot of stage presence when performing pop and country. That sometimes translates...and sometimes doesn't...into success in acting roles. And Stephen Moyer was also a bet worth making. And casting pros like Audra and Laura likely helped the whole cast find their footing. This production was created with very high standards and very big ambitions...yeah, we can all criticize what didn't work (and plenty did not work) but a lot doesn't work in live television. When you watch old kinescopes from the Golden Age of Television you see lots of static stagings, lots of wooden performances, lots of awkward moments...and lots of powerful, unforgettable things. SOUND OF MUSIC LIVE had a few of those, too. And, even though it only part-way worked, they did it without a net...and without auto-tune....and without re-dos...and without any guarantees. I freely criticize cynical, low-expectation, bottom-feeding television all the time....this, for all of its flaws, was not that.


reply to this message |
re: SOM THING GOOD

Posted by: lowwriter 11:50 am EST 12/07/13
In reply to: re: SOM THING GOOD - hugoP 12:46 am EST 12/07/13

My feeling is that if this had been an actual production of SOM that had allowed a few previews, Carrie might have improved acting wise with an audience. It was risky doing it this way.
I know Moyer had some stage experience but I think they should have tried harder casting Von Trapp since he didn't have much chemistry with Carrie.


reply to this message |
re: SOM THING GOOD

Posted by: Chromolume 12:52 am EST 12/07/13
In reply to: re: SOM THING GOOD - hugoP 12:46 am EST 12/07/13

And has anyone yet noted that the telecast also dodged a major potential bullet? Had the announcement of Mandela's death come only a few hours later than it did, might NBC have felt covering that news was more important than a live musical? That could have been a very odd situation. (I assume that they would have simply held the broadcast - or held on at whatever point it was interrupted, resuming after the coverage. But who knows?)


reply to this message | reply to first message


All That Chat is intended for the discussion of theatre news and opinion
subject to the terms and conditions of the Terms of Service. (Please take all off-topic discussion to private email.)

Please direct technical questions/comments to webmaster@talkinbroadway.com and policy questions to TBAdmin@talkinbroadway.com.

[ Home | On the Rialto | The Siegel Column | E-Opinions | Cabaret | Tony Awards | Book Reviews | Great White Wayback Machine ]
[ Broadway Reviews | Barbara and Scott: The Two of Clubs | Sound Advice | Restaurant Revue | Off Broadway | Funding Talkin' Broadway ]
[ Broadway 101 | Spotlight On | Talkin' Broadway | On the Boards | Regional | Talk to Us! | Search Talkin' Broadway ]

Terms of Service
[ © 1997 - 2013 www.TalkinBroadway.com, Inc. ]

Time to render: 0.075344 seconds.