HOME ALL THAT CHAT ATC WEST COAST SHOPPIN' RUSH BOARD FAQS

LOGIN REGISTER SEARCH THREADED MODE E-OPINIONS

not logged in

Threaded Order | Chronological Order

re: Why not Cast Audra in "Kiss Me Kate"? or something she is better suited

Posted by: Chromolume 03:15 pm EST 12/07/13
In reply to: Why not Cast Audra in "Kiss Me Kate"? or something she is better suited - Greg_M 02:36 pm EST 12/07/13

"A Chorus Line" would be wonderful but almost impossible to pull off for the family audience and the recent revival proved it will need a great director to make it work.


Also, A Chorus Line is not a vehicle (though the film tried to make it one - big mistake) - I have a feeling they'll want to look at shows with true starring roles, not ensemble pieces.


reply to this message |

re: Why not Cast Audra in "Kiss Me Kate"? or something she is better suited

Posted by: LegitOnce 03:18 pm EST 12/07/13
In reply to: re: Why not Cast Audra in "Kiss Me Kate"? or something she is better suited - Chromolume 03:15 pm EST 12/07/13

Besides, Chorus Line is a lousy show propped up by fantastic direction and performances in its original production. Without those elements, it's basically a mishmosh.


reply to this message |

re: Why not Cast Audra in "Kiss Me Kate"? or something she is better suited

Posted by: Chromolume 03:29 pm EST 12/07/13
In reply to: re: Why not Cast Audra in "Kiss Me Kate"? or something she is better suited - LegitOnce 03:18 pm EST 12/07/13

Besides, Chorus Line is a lousy show propped up by fantastic direction and performances in its original production.

I'm very, very, very sorry you feel that way.


reply to this message | reply to first message

re: Why not Cast Audra in "Kiss Me Kate"? or something she is better suited

Posted by: LegitOnce 03:32 pm EST 12/07/13
In reply to: re: Why not Cast Audra in "Kiss Me Kate"? or something she is better suited - Chromolume 03:29 pm EST 12/07/13

Matter of taste.


reply to this message | reply to first message

re: Why not Cast Audra in "Kiss Me Kate"? or something she is better suited

Posted by: enoch10 09:05 pm EST 12/07/13
In reply to: re: Why not Cast Audra in "Kiss Me Kate"? or something she is better suited - LegitOnce 03:32 pm EST 12/07/13

>> Matter of taste.

well, you're right about that.


reply to this message | reply to first message

re: Why not Cast Audra in "Kiss Me Kate"? or something she is better suited

Posted by: Chromolume 03:36 pm EST 12/07/13
In reply to: re: Why not Cast Audra in "Kiss Me Kate"? or something she is better suited - LegitOnce 03:32 pm EST 12/07/13

Well, then, you really ought to say:

"Besides, I feel that Chorus Line is a lousy show propped up by fantastic direction and performances in its original production. Without those elements, I think that it's basically a mishmosh."

;-)


reply to this message | reply to first message

re: Why not Cast Audra in "Kiss Me Kate"? or something she is better suited

Posted by: LegitOnce 04:08 pm EST 12/07/13
In reply to: re: Why not Cast Audra in "Kiss Me Kate"? or something she is better suited - Chromolume 03:36 pm EST 12/07/13

Well, "lousy" is a value judgment. I do think the show has a sentimental mess of a book and the music is very uneven, with a very obvious bid for radio play with the big ballad.


reply to this message | reply to first message


All That Chat is intended for the discussion of theatre news and opinion
subject to the terms and conditions of the Terms of Service. (Please take all off-topic discussion to private email.)

Please direct technical questions/comments to webmaster@talkinbroadway.com and policy questions to TBAdmin@talkinbroadway.com.

[ Home | On the Rialto | The Siegel Column | E-Opinions | Cabaret | Tony Awards | Book Reviews | Great White Wayback Machine ]
[ Broadway Reviews | Barbara and Scott: The Two of Clubs | Sound Advice | Restaurant Revue | Off Broadway | Funding Talkin' Broadway ]
[ Broadway 101 | Spotlight On | Talkin' Broadway | On the Boards | Regional | Talk to Us! | Search Talkin' Broadway ]

Terms of Service
[ © 1997 - 2013 www.TalkinBroadway.com, Inc. ]

Time to render: 0.230016 seconds.