HOME ALL THAT CHAT ATC WEST COAST SHOPPIN' RUSH BOARD FAQS

LOGIN REGISTER SEARCH THREADED MODE

not logged in

Threaded Order | Chronological Order

re: "brilliantly scaled-down chamber version of the piece"

Posted by: Chromolume 10:58 pm EST 01/16/14
In reply to: re: "brilliantly scaled-down chamber version of the piece" - Singapore/Fling 07:53 pm EST 01/16/14

I can guarantee everyone that his take on "Mr. Andrew's Vision" will not fly in New York. And hopefully he'll also gotten rid of having Ismay sing the opening, rather than Mr. Andrews.

Do tell, what did he do to "Mr. Andrews' Vision"??

I definitely agree that Ismay should NOT sing the opening. Terrible idea.

About "Mr. Andrews' Vision" by the way - no one has brought up the national tour adaptation of the show, which I thought was very poorly done -- but I admit that I did buy the conceit for that one song, having Andrews amid the passengers on deck, instead of below them in the smokeroom (as there was no lower level). It still worked dramatically - though for me there's still no comparison to the original, Andrews being assaulted by the items and furniture in the smokeroom as the ship lurched, the passengers above screaming as they held onto the rail...the last image of the grand piano about to crush Andrews...that scene was a real coup de theatre.

My main frustration with Southerland's production in London was that it was just too big a show to try and pull off in that tiny space.

Despite a general belief that we'd all like to have that theatre can be done anywhere, I do think there are some shows where size IS the point. Titanic is, IMo, absiolutely one of these. I'm not saying it can't somehow be made to work in a smaller venue, but I really think that without the big playing area, a big set, and yes, a big orchestra, you really lose the, well, titanic feel of the piece, which I feel is integral. It just wouldn't be the same.


reply to this message |

re: "brilliantly scaled-down chamber version of the piece"

Posted by: Singapore/Fling 04:01 pm EST 01/17/14
In reply to: re: "brilliantly scaled-down chamber version of the piece" - Chromolume 10:58 pm EST 01/16/14

Southerland tried to do something with ropes that rose and fell; the night we were there, one of the ropes got snagged, which was unfortunately comical, and added to by an actor trying to fix the ropes and then tripping (in one of those moments of "gee, I hope he doesn't forget about that other rope and trip on it"), and taking a face splat onto the upper platform. But even if they had done what they were meant to, it's hard to imagine that it would have achieved any real effect.

I don't think that "Titanic" necessarily needs a production as epic as the original Broadway - for a long time, there was video on YouTube from an Australian production that made do with a two level sit that did not tilt, and it worked perfectly well. It's just that in the Southwark, everything about it -- from the settings to the lighting, to the just-too-small cast, to the out-of-focus projector -- were chafing at the seams of the tiny space. This became particularly apparent in Act Two, when the production really hit against the wall creatively, in terms of how to show the evacuation and the sinking.

Their stripped down orchestra, though, worked well. And in some ways, with a little less instrumentation, it makes the beauty of the vocal harmonies all the more stunning. Despite my growing frustrations with the many changes made to the material as the show wore on, I was definitely in tears at the end of that magnificent opening.

I've asked this before, but does anyone out there know about approved changes to the performance script? This version had a full duet for Caroline and Charles in Act 1 (either a new song, or the song that was cut in Bway previews), and also took out some musical bits here and there, and also took out the great sequence of text quartets after the Lifeboats scene (the one that was staged in NY with the faces at portholes while the set was changed behind them). I presumed that the cuts were to do with the lack of actors, but am still flummoxed by that new duet.

(As I said here before, they were right to cut the Caroline and Charles duet the first time around, as it adds nothing to the show.)


reply to this message |


All That Chat is intended for the discussion of theatre news and opinion
subject to the terms and conditions of the Terms of Service. (Please take all off-topic discussion to private email.)

Please direct technical questions/comments to webmaster@talkinbroadway.com and policy questions to TBAdmin@talkinbroadway.com.

[ Home | On the Rialto | The Siegel Column | Cabaret | Tony Awards | Book Reviews | Great White Wayback Machine ]
[ Broadway Reviews | Barbara and Scott: The Two of Clubs | Sound Advice | Restaurant Revue | Off Broadway | Funding Talkin' Broadway ]
[ Broadway 101 | Spotlight On | Talkin' Broadway | On the Boards | Regional | Talk to Us! | Search Talkin' Broadway ]

Terms of Service
[ © 1997 - 2014 www.TalkinBroadway.com, Inc. ]

Time to render: 0.049116 seconds.