HOME ALL THAT CHAT ATC WEST COAST SHOPPIN' RUSH BOARD FAQS

LOGIN REGISTER SEARCH THREADED MODE

not logged in

Threaded Order | Chronological Order

re: Maybe Daniel Radcliffe?

Posted by: sf 05:02 pm EST 01/20/14
In reply to: re: Maybe Daniel Radcliffe? - ryhog 03:35 pm EST 01/20/14

What charming language.

You don't see a *slight* difference between performing in a medium-sized West End theatre to a single audience and performing on a soundstage to a television audience of millions? Or between performing a play over an extended run of somewhere between a few weeks and a few months and getting *one shot* at getting it right?


reply to this message |
re: Maybe Daniel Radcliffe?

Posted by: ryhog 05:13 pm EST 01/20/14
In reply to: re: Maybe Daniel Radcliffe? - sf 05:02 pm EST 01/20/14

In terms of the craft of acting and the "stretching" thereof, which is what you stated as the reason he would do this, no I don't, and I find it hard to believe anyone would.


reply to this message |
re: Maybe Daniel Radcliffe?

Posted by: sf 05:29 pm EST 01/20/14
In reply to: re: Maybe Daniel Radcliffe? - ryhog 05:13 pm EST 01/20/14

Really? You don't see any difference at all between honing a performance over weeks of previews in front of an audience, or developing a performance in multiple takes on a film set, and a live TV broadcast in front of millions in which there's no opportunity at all to correct a mistake?

Whatever. Thank you, at least, for managing to express yourself this time without resorting to juvenile profanity.


reply to this message | reply to first message
re: Maybe Daniel Radcliffe?

Posted by: ryhog 10:19 pm EST 01/20/14
In reply to: re: Maybe Daniel Radcliffe? - sf 05:29 pm EST 01/20/14

from the standpoint of the craft of acting, or, more specifically, the sort of "stretching" that Daniel Radcliffe might be inclined to seek in projects, no, not at all.

I also don't think he would be inclined to walk a tight rope, just because it exposes him to risks he would otherwise avoid. That's not how I define acting. "Juvenile profanity"? That sounds like an oxymoron.


reply to this message | reply to first message


All That Chat is intended for the discussion of theatre news and opinion
subject to the terms and conditions of the Terms of Service. (Please take all off-topic discussion to private email.)

Please direct technical questions/comments to webmaster@talkinbroadway.com and policy questions to TBAdmin@talkinbroadway.com.

[ Home | On the Rialto | The Siegel Column | Cabaret | Tony Awards | Book Reviews | Great White Wayback Machine ]
[ Broadway Reviews | Barbara and Scott: The Two of Clubs | Sound Advice | Restaurant Revue | Off Broadway | Funding Talkin' Broadway ]
[ Broadway 101 | Spotlight On | Talkin' Broadway | On the Boards | Regional | Talk to Us! | Search Talkin' Broadway ]

Terms of Service
[ © 1997 - 2014 www.TalkinBroadway.com, Inc. ]

Time to render: 0.132087 seconds.