All That Chat - re: Re-read the quote, people

HOME ALL THAT CHAT ATC WEST COAST SHOPPIN' RUSH BOARD FAQS

LOGIN REGISTER SEARCH FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Re-read the quote, people

Posted by:	ryhog 11:33 am EDT 04/03/14
In reply to:	Re-read the quote, people - Michael_Portantiere 11:18 am EDT 04/03/14

I agree with your reading of what Sondheim meant. But that only underscores my point: why are they expending scarce resources pretending to preserve things that do not require preserving? There are, as you rightly point out, lots of recordings that are NOT preserved or at least not well preserved. But preserving obscure recordings gets no publicity, so they make a pretense of preserving something that does not need it. Typical.

reply \|

Previous:	Re-read the quote, people - Michael_Portantiere 11:18 am EDT 04/03/14
Next:	re: Re-read the quote, people - Michael_Portantiere 11:40 am EDT 04/03/14

Thread:	re: Re-read the quote, people - Michael_Portantiere 11:40 am EDT 04/03/14 (7) re: Re-read the quote, people - ryhog 11:52 am EDT 04/03/14 (6) re: Re-read the quote, people - Michael_Portantiere 11:56 am EDT 04/03/14 (5) also - ryhog 12:15 pm EDT 04/03/14 re: Re-read the quote, people - ryhog 12:10 pm EDT 04/03/14 (3) the Beatles catalog is not owned by Apple, Inc. - Vint 05:02 pm EDT 04/03/14 (2) No-just the digital distribution rights - ryhog 05:48 pm EDT 04/03/14 (1) Please take this discussion to email - T.B._Admin. 06:12 pm EDT 04/03/14

All That Chat is intended for the discussion of theatre news and opinion
subject to the terms and conditions of the Terms of Service. (Please take all off-topic discussion to private email.)