HOME ALL THAT CHAT ATC WEST COAST SHOPPIN' RUSH BOARD FAQS

LOGIN REGISTER SEARCH FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Sorry...Jeremy

Posted by: robert_j 02:24 pm EDT 08/05/14
In reply to: re: Sorry...Jeremy - JereNYC 02:14 pm EDT 08/05/14

I agree with this. But I also think the reviewer is being a bit picky here. Yes, I guess the two could have had more chemistry, now that I think about it, but it did not stand out as a problem. And it could well be that the chemistry will get stronger over a longer run.

I also don't think that Fool for Love needs to be paired with another play. Yes, it is a bit short, but not unusually so, especially since 90 minute running times are so common these days. I felt like I got my money's worth.


reply |

Previous: re: Sorry...Jeremy - JereNYC 02:14 pm EDT 08/05/14
Next: Anderson & Petty at 54 Below - Broadway Performer Announcements - markrobertpetty 10:02 am EDT 08/05/14

Thread:


    All That Chat is intended for the discussion of theatre news and opinion
    subject to the terms and conditions of the Terms of Service. (Please take all off-topic discussion to private email.)

    Please direct technical questions/comments to webmaster@talkinbroadway.com and policy questions to TBAdmin@talkinbroadway.com.

    [ Home | On the Rialto | The Siegel Column | Cabaret | Tony Awards | Book Reviews | Great White Wayback Machine ]
    [ Broadway Reviews | Barbara and Scott: The Two of Clubs | Sound Advice | Restaurant Revue | Off Broadway | Funding Talkin' Broadway ]
    [ Broadway 101 | Spotlight On | Talkin' Broadway | On the Boards | Regional | Talk to Us! | Search Talkin' Broadway ]

    Terms of Service
    [ © 1997 - 2014 www.TalkinBroadway.com, Inc. ]

    Time to render: 0.008892 seconds.