HOME ALL THAT CHAT ATC WEST COAST SHOPPIN' RUSH BOARD FAQS

LOGIN REGISTER SEARCH FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Maybe landmark is a strong way of putting it...

Posted by: Zelgo 04:49 pm EDT 08/06/14
In reply to: re: Maybe landmark is a strong way of putting it... - bway1430 04:02 pm EDT 08/06/14

I know many have a special place in their hearts for this show, but it is hardly an important show in the history of theatre.

How many "important" shows were flops with scores no one knows?

Shows like Oklahoma, South Pacific, Hair, etc. that pushed the envelope are important because they were also huge hits.

While I am glad this is getting another chance on Bway, its subject matter will keep many away, just like it did during its first go-round.


reply |

Previous: re: Maybe landmark is a strong way of putting it... - chrisampm 08:28 pm EDT 08/06/14
Next: re: Maybe landmark is a strong way of putting it... - Singapore/Fling 04:07 pm EDT 08/06/14

Thread:


    All That Chat is intended for the discussion of theatre news and opinion
    subject to the terms and conditions of the Terms of Service. (Please take all off-topic discussion to private email.)

    Please direct technical questions/comments to webmaster@talkinbroadway.com and policy questions to TBAdmin@talkinbroadway.com.

    [ Home | On the Rialto | The Siegel Column | Cabaret | Tony Awards | Book Reviews | Great White Wayback Machine ]
    [ Broadway Reviews | Barbara and Scott: The Two of Clubs | Sound Advice | Restaurant Revue | Off Broadway | Funding Talkin' Broadway ]
    [ Broadway 101 | Spotlight On | Talkin' Broadway | On the Boards | Regional | Talk to Us! | Search Talkin' Broadway ]

    Terms of Service
    [ © 1997 - 2014 www.TalkinBroadway.com, Inc. ]

    Time to render: 0.002153 seconds.