HOME ALL THAT CHAT ATC WEST COAST SHOPPIN' RUSH BOARD FAQS

LOGIN REGISTER SEARCH THREADED MODE

not logged in

Threaded Order | Chronological Order

Back when the met was young ...

Posted by: NewtonUK 05:32 pm EDT 08/06/14
In reply to: re: The Case for Peter Gelb - Michael_Portantiere 02:08 pm EDT 08/06/14

... and operas were being written apace ... here are some of the operas seen in New York. Interesting because the Met, in its 4000 seat barn, seems to ignore most of whats going in world opera since - well - maybe 1960? 1950?

Below interesting operas, some good, some not so good, many worth seeing today, that Met did between its opening and World War II. (see below for SINCE World War 2

BEFORE WW2 ends 1882-1945 (63 years) 93 works

Flotow's MARTHA
Boito's wonderful MEFISTOFELE
Thomas' MIGNON
Meyerbeer's int'l hit ROBERT LE DIABLE
Weber's DER FREISCHUTZ
Boildieu's LA DAME BLANCHE
Halevy's LA JUIVE
Rossini's WILLIAM TELL
Goldmark's QUEEN OF SHEBA
Brull THE GOLDEN CROSS
Wagner's RIENZI
Goldmark MERLIN
Nessler TRUMPTER OF SAKKINGEN
Smareglia Il Vassalo di Szigeth
Meyerbeer DINORAH
Delibes LAKME
Meyerbeer L'AFRICAINE
Bemberg ELAINE
Massenet LE CID
Nikolai THE MERRY WIVES OF WINDSOR
Reyer SALAMMBO
Paderewski MANRU
de Lara MESSALINE
Ethel Smyth DER WALD
Auber FRA DIAVOLO
Mascagni IRIS
Catalani LA WALLY
Smetana THE BARTERED BRIDE
D'Albert TIEFLAND
Flotow ALLESANDRO STRADELLA
Franchetti GERMANIA
Bruneau LATTAQUE DU MOULIN
Lecoq LA FILLE DU MADAME ANGOT
Converse THE PIPE OF DESIRE
Lortzing ZAR UND ZIMMERMAN
Dukas ARIANE ET BARBE-BLEU
Humperdinck KONIGSKINDER (WP)
Wolf-Ferrari LE DONNA CURIOUSE
Thuille LOBETANZ
Parker MONA (WP)
Blech VERSIEGELT
Wolf GFerrari SECRET IOF SUSANNA
Charpentier JULIEN
Montemezzi THE LOVE OF THREE KINGS
Wolf Ferrari LAMORE MEDICO
Victor Herbert MADELEINE
Giordano MADAME SANS GENE
Albeniz GOYESCAS
Goetz THE TAMING OF THE SHREW
de Koven CANTERBURY PILGRIMS
Rimsky Korsakov LE COQ D'OR
Mascagni LODOLETTA
Rabaud MAROUF
Liszt SAINT ELIZABETH
Brothers Ricci CRISPINO E LO COMARE
leroux LA REINE FIAMMETE
Gounod MIREILLE
Weber OBERON
Hadley CLEOPATRA'S NIGHT
Leoncavallo ZAZA
Weis THE POLISH JEW
Korngold DIE TOTE STADT
Lalo LE ROI D'YS
Catalani LORELEY
Rimsky Korsakov THE SNOW MAIDEN
von Schillings MONA LISA
Riccitelli I COMPAGNACCI
Mascagni L'AMICO FRITZ
Montemezzi GIOVANNI GALLURESE
Cornelius THE BARBER OF BAGHDAD
Massenet DON QUICHOTTE
Wolf Ferrari JEWELS OF THE MADONNA
Giordano LA CENE DELLA BEFFE
Spontini LA VESTALE
Deems Taylor THE KING'S HENCHMAN
Alfano MADONNA IMPERIA
Korngold VIOLANTA
Krenek JONNY SPIELT AUF
Respighi LA CAMPANA SOMMERSA
Rimskly Korsakove SADKO
Mascagni IRIS
Deems Taylor PETER IBBOTSON
Mussorgsky FAIR AT SOROCHNITZY
von Supper DONNA JUANITA
Montemezzi NIGHT OF ZORAIMA
Weinberger SCHWANDA THE BAGPIPER
Gruenberg THE EMPEROR JONES
Donizetti LINDA DI CHAMOUNIX
Hanson MEERY MOUNT
Cimarosa MATRIMONIO SEGRETO
Damrosch MAN WITHOUT A COUNTRY
Menotti AMELIA GOES TO THE BALL
Menotti THE ISLAND GOD
rogers Corwin THE WARRIOR

SINCE WORLD WAR II AT THE MET
(1946-2014, 68 years) 31 works

Barber VANESSA
Menotti THE LAST SAVAGE
Barber ANTONY & CLEOPATRA
Levy MOURNING BECOMES ELEKTRA
Britten DEATH IN VENICE
Rossini SIEGE OF CORINTH
Massenet ESCLARMONDE
Britten BILLY BUDD
Zandonai FRANCESCA DA RIMINI
Handel RINALDO
Corgliano GHOSTS OF VERSAILLE
Glass THE VOYAGE
Verdi I LOMBARDI
Verdi STIFFELIO
Britten A MIDSUMMER NIGHTS DREAM
Schoenberg MOSES UND ARON
Harbison THE GREAT GATSBY
Busoni DOKTOR FAUST
Prokofiev THE GAMBLER
Wolf Ferrari SLY
Previn A VIEW FROM THE BRIDGE
Prokofiev WAR & PEACE
Alfano CYRANO
Picker AN AMERICAN TRAGEDY
Tchaikivsky MAZEPPA
Glass SATYAGRAHA
Adams DOCTOR ATOMIC
Janacek FROM THE HOUSE OF THE DEAD
Ades THE TEMPEST
Muny TWO BOYS
Glinka PRINCE IGOR

Composers of note whom the Met has ignored:

Michael Tippett, von Einem, Salinnen, Kokkonen, Vaughan Williams, Walton, Ligeti, Paulus, Henze, Messiaen, Argento, Birtwistle, Rihm, Maxwell davies, Rautavaara, Schnittke, Bryars, Saariaho, Heggie, Turnage, Goolijov, Neuwirth, Dove, Wouorronin


reply to this message |

re: Back when the met was young ...

Posted by: bwaydiva1 11:32 am EDT 08/07/14
In reply to: Back when the met was young ... - NewtonUK 05:32 pm EDT 08/06/14

Heggie should have had "Dead Man Walking" at the Met with Joyce DiDonato. (Paging Mr. Gelb-she could still do it-and she brings in a lot of people.)


reply to this message |

re: Back when the met was young ...

Posted by: LegitOnce 09:05 pm EDT 08/07/14
In reply to: re: Back when the met was young ... - bwaydiva1 11:32 am EDT 08/07/14

"Dead Man Walking"-- with Joyce DiDonato in fact -- played at the New York City Opera in 2002, four years before Gelb came to the Met, and it got lousy reviews then.

But by all means, use the fact that Gelb has not revived an opera that failed at NYCO barely a decade agao, and with the same leading singer to boot, as proof of his incompetence. Armchair artistic direction is easy when one is utterly ignorant of history.


reply to this message | reply to first message

re: Back when the met was young ...

Posted by: LegitOnce 09:10 pm EDT 08/07/14
In reply to: re: Back when the met was young ... - LegitOnce 09:05 pm EDT 08/07/14

For example,

"...when the score to a new American opera is as uneven as Mr. Heggie's, the popularity of the work is a more problematic matter.... Mr. Heggie's music, which, though professional and ardent, softens the edges of the grisly story. The score lacks the gravity, and subtlety, to deal with this subject. Echoes of Barber, Copland, Gershwin and especially Bernstein are too close to the surface. The vernacular music Mr. Heggie composes is quite tame, like the gospel tune that Sister Helen teaches the children at Hope House, the school she runs. Stronger composers evoke vernacular song and dance by adding some contemporary twists of their own."


reply to this message | reply to first message

re: Back when the met was young ...

Posted by: Chromolume 11:24 pm EDT 08/07/14
In reply to: re: Back when the met was young ... - LegitOnce 09:10 pm EDT 08/07/14

Yeah, but you know what? A composer just can't win anymore. Either the music is deemed "unhummable/unmemorable/unmelodic" etc, or the music is automatically compared to recognizable styles of past composers. It's getting harder and harder to not be condemned for either being too melodic, or not melodic enough.


reply to this message | reply to first message

re: Back when the met was young ...

Posted by: LegitOnce 01:18 am EDT 08/08/14
In reply to: re: Back when the met was young ... - Chromolume 11:24 pm EDT 08/07/14

I don't know that I agree with you. I review around eight or 10 new works a year, and looking back at my reviews, I find I'm pretty positive about the music half the time or maybe a little more. Alex Ross of the New Yorker I think does a really heroic job of seeking out and understanding new music, and the writers at the New York Times, even if their tastes are pretty diverse, do try to meet the composers halfway.

I was blown away, for example, by Gregory Spears' opera Paul's Case last winter: it was original and just radiantly beautiful, and I hope I was able to express that in my review. Some other new pieces I heard that week I was not quite so enthusiastic about, but I don't think it's fair to say that a composer "can't win."

Link New York Observer

reply to this message | reply to first message

re: Back when the met was young ...

Posted by: Chromolume 09:02 am EDT 08/08/14
In reply to: re: Back when the met was young ... - LegitOnce 01:18 am EDT 08/08/14

Maybe it's just that you try to do a better, more objective (and enthusiastic) job than many. And I applaud you for that. ;-)


reply to this message | reply to first message

re: Back when the met was young ...

Posted by: Michael_Portantiere 12:22 am EDT 08/10/14
In reply to: re: Back when the met was young ... - Chromolume 09:02 am EDT 08/08/14

"Maybe it's just that you try to do a better, more objective (and enthusiastic) job than many."

I don't think someone's general reviewing style can be "objective" and "enthusiastic" at the same time, but at any rate, many people would say that objectivity in reviewing art is both unattainable and undesirable.


reply to this message | reply to first message


All That Chat is intended for the discussion of theatre news and opinion
subject to the terms and conditions of the Terms of Service. (Please take all off-topic discussion to private email.)

Please direct technical questions/comments to webmaster@talkinbroadway.com and policy questions to TBAdmin@talkinbroadway.com.

[ Home | On the Rialto | The Siegel Column | Cabaret | Tony Awards | Book Reviews | Great White Wayback Machine ]
[ Broadway Reviews | Barbara and Scott: The Two of Clubs | Sound Advice | Restaurant Revue | Off Broadway | Funding Talkin' Broadway ]
[ Broadway 101 | Spotlight On | Talkin' Broadway | On the Boards | Regional | Talk to Us! | Search Talkin' Broadway ]

Terms of Service
[ © 1997 - 2014 www.TalkinBroadway.com, Inc. ]

Time to render: 0.063604 seconds.