HOME ALL THAT CHAT ATC WEST COAST SHOPPIN' RUSH BOARD FAQS

LOGIN REGISTER SEARCH FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Reactions

Posted by: ryhog 05:16 pm EDT 08/08/14
In reply to: re: Reactions - AlanScott 05:05 pm EDT 08/08/14

agree it is objectionable (just as it is when people do the same thing here). I think you could fairly say that the previous incarnations did not prompt anyone to bring it in (obviously true) and conclude from that that it did not knock the socks off of any of the people who were in a position to bring it in (or enough of them, at least), but clearly that is not the context in which he said what he said. And the segue to Isherwood is doubly objectionable in that it seems to mean that anyone equates to anyone around here.


reply |

Previous: re: Reactions - AlanScott 07:56 pm EDT 08/09/14
Next: re: Reactions - MockingbirdGirl 05:29 pm EDT 08/08/14

Thread:


All That Chat is intended for the discussion of theatre news and opinion
subject to the terms and conditions of the Terms of Service. (Please take all off-topic discussion to private email.)

Please direct technical questions/comments to webmaster@talkinbroadway.com and policy questions to TBAdmin@talkinbroadway.com.

[ Home | On the Rialto | The Siegel Column | Cabaret | Tony Awards | Book Reviews | Great White Wayback Machine ]
[ Broadway Reviews | Barbara and Scott: The Two of Clubs | Sound Advice | Restaurant Revue | Off Broadway | Funding Talkin' Broadway ]
[ Broadway 101 | Spotlight On | Talkin' Broadway | On the Boards | Regional | Talk to Us! | Search Talkin' Broadway ]

Terms of Service
[ © 1997 - 2014 www.TalkinBroadway.com, Inc. ]

Time to render: 0.021525 seconds.