HOME ALL THAT CHAT ATC WEST COAST SHOPPIN' RUSH BOARD FAQS

LOGIN REGISTER SEARCH FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: post hoc ergo propter hoc

Posted by: ryhog 01:35 am EDT 09/09/14
In reply to: re: post hoc ergo propter hoc - Thom915 01:26 am EDT 09/09/14

the suggestion that, because Jujamcym is dimming their lights, they are doing so in reaction to the "public outcry" and not because Jordan Roth, like many here, was moved to honor Joan Rivers in this way (and would have done so without regard to either a public outcry or, as transpired, the Shubert's disinterest in doing so.


reply |

Previous: re: post hoc ergo propter hoc - Thom915 01:26 am EDT 09/09/14
Next: re: post hoc ergo propter hoc - enoch10 04:08 pm EDT 09/09/14

Thread:


All That Chat is intended for the discussion of theatre news and opinion
subject to the terms and conditions of the Terms of Service. (Please take all off-topic discussion to private email.)

Please direct technical questions/comments to webmaster@talkinbroadway.com and policy questions to TBAdmin@talkinbroadway.com.

[ Home | On the Rialto | The Siegel Column | Cabaret | Tony Awards | Book Reviews | Great White Wayback Machine ]
[ Broadway Reviews | Barbara and Scott: The Two of Clubs | Sound Advice | Restaurant Revue | Off Broadway | Funding Talkin' Broadway ]
[ Broadway 101 | Spotlight On | Talkin' Broadway | On the Boards | Regional | Talk to Us! | Search Talkin' Broadway ]

Terms of Service
[ © 1997 - 2014 www.TalkinBroadway.com, Inc. ]

Time to render: 0.022439 seconds.