All That Chat - re: post hoc ergo propter hoc

HOME ALL THAT CHAT ATC WEST COAST SHOPPIN' RUSH BOARD FAQS

LOGIN REGISTER SEARCH FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: post hoc ergo propter hoc

Posted by:	ryhog 11:01 am EDT 09/09/14
In reply to:	re: post hoc ergo propter hoc - Thom915 01:46 am EDT 09/09/14

I can't say who is right about what the OP meant, but I don't think Roth's astuteness came into play, because I think he would have done it anyway, and I think he would have known that even before the meeting. As a side point, I also think that all of this is what happens when you dilute the meaning of the dimming, as they have done. Were the past honorees all major Broadway figures, we would not be having this discussion. Again the baseball analogy tells us something as it relates to the retirement of numbers.

reply \|

Previous:	re: post hoc ergo propter hoc - Thom915 01:46 am EDT 09/09/14
Next:	re: A Change of Heart? - bwaydiva1 10:16 pm EDT 09/08/14

Thread:

All That Chat is intended for the discussion of theatre news and opinion
subject to the terms and conditions of the Terms of Service. (Please take all off-topic discussion to private email.)