HOME ALL THAT CHAT ATC WEST COAST SHOPPIN' RUSH BOARD FAQS

LOGIN REGISTER SEARCH FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: No

Posted by: ryhog 05:21 pm EDT 09/09/14
In reply to: re: No - Zelgo 05:10 pm EDT 09/09/14

I am about done with repeating myself here but the meaninglessness is that the dimming was not a plebescite, it was a gesture by the League toward individuals they deemed worthy. The League reached a decision, and reversed it only to shut the mob up. What possible meaning could the gesture have in that context? If the fans (and that includes me) care about honoring Joan,then they should honor Joan instead of forcing someone else to honor her even when they clearly concluded it was not warranted. And that's all I have to say on the subject. I think.


reply |

Previous: re: No - MockingbirdGirl 06:00 pm EDT 09/09/14
Next: re: No - portenopete 05:51 pm EDT 09/09/14

Thread:


All That Chat is intended for the discussion of theatre news and opinion
subject to the terms and conditions of the Terms of Service. (Please take all off-topic discussion to private email.)

Please direct technical questions/comments to webmaster@talkinbroadway.com and policy questions to TBAdmin@talkinbroadway.com.

[ Home | On the Rialto | The Siegel Column | Cabaret | Tony Awards | Book Reviews | Great White Wayback Machine ]
[ Broadway Reviews | Barbara and Scott: The Two of Clubs | Sound Advice | Restaurant Revue | Off Broadway | Funding Talkin' Broadway ]
[ Broadway 101 | Spotlight On | Talkin' Broadway | On the Boards | Regional | Talk to Us! | Search Talkin' Broadway ]

Terms of Service
[ © 1997 - 2014 www.TalkinBroadway.com, Inc. ]

Time to render: 0.029339 seconds.