HOME ALL THAT CHAT ATC WEST COAST SHOPPIN' RUSH BOARD FAQS

LOGIN REGISTER SEARCH FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Comment, question and link to Times review

Posted by: Ann 02:01 pm EST 11/20/14
In reply to: re: Comment, question and link to Times review - StaunchKarakter 01:52 pm EST 11/20/14

I understand your take on it, even if it's not what I experienced. Though people thought the Queens production was very good, the fact is the show has been a failure. That makes the idea of this approach more interesting to me than Doyle's takes on Company and Sweeney Todd (though I can't say I disliked those either, knowing they won't replace the more traditional stagings).

It seems to be a small story (though allegorical), and I don't know that it needs a cast of 80.

But it has gotten me to get that studio cast recording out and I've been listening to it all week.

And, gee, part of the magic of theatre is that two people can watch the same show and view it entirely differently. How boring All That Chat would be if we all felt the same ;)


reply |

Previous: re: Comment, question and link to Times review - ukpaul 07:21 pm EST 11/20/14
Next: re: Comment, question and link to Times review - BroadwayTonyJ 04:50 pm EST 11/20/14

Thread:


All That Chat is intended for the discussion of theatre news and opinion
subject to the terms and conditions of the Terms of Service. (Please take all off-topic discussion to private email.)

Please direct technical questions/comments to webmaster@talkinbroadway.com and policy questions to TBAdmin@talkinbroadway.com.

[ Home | On the Rialto | The Siegel Column | Cabaret | Tony Awards | Book Reviews | Great White Wayback Machine ]
[ Broadway Reviews | Barbara and Scott: The Two of Clubs | Sound Advice | Sound Advice Upcoming Releases CDs/Books/DVDs, etc. | Off Broadway | Funding Talkin' Broadway ]
[ Broadway 101 | Spotlight On | Talkin' Broadway | On the Boards | Regional | Talk to Us! | Search Talkin' Broadway ]

Terms of Service
[ © 1997 - 2014 www.TalkinBroadway.com, Inc. ]

Time to render: 0.001968 seconds.