HOME ALL THAT CHAT ATC WEST COAST SHOPPIN' RUSH BOARD FAQS

LOGIN REGISTER SEARCH THREADED MODE

not logged in

Threaded Order | Chronological Order

re: Honeymoon in Vegas tonight

Posted by: lowwriter 12:31 am EST 11/22/14
In reply to: Honeymoon in Vegas tonight - adammueller308 11:58 pm EST 11/21/14

I'm not surprised. The cold temperatures are keeping people inside. And people don't want to go out the weekend before Thanksgiving.


reply to this message |

on cold temperatures keeping people away etc.

Posted by: seeseveryshow 09:28 am EST 11/22/14
In reply to: re: Honeymoon in Vegas tonight - lowwriter 12:31 am EST 11/22/14

I don't buy that. The theater district was mobbed last night, and it was, in fact, NYC's first gridlock alert day of the holiday season.

I agree that blizzard conditions often keep people home, or create travel problems. The weather last night was quite pleasant. I don't believe you can blame the weather or the time of year for an empty mezzanine at the Nederlander last night.

The show just started, and Danza's no Cooper or Jackman. I will attend tomorrow afternoon, and report back on the attendance, etc.


reply to this message |

i was very disappointed in the Paper Mill production

Posted by: bythesea2007 10:30 am EST 11/22/14
In reply to: on cold temperatures keeping people away etc. - seeseveryshow 09:28 am EST 11/22/14

I thought the movie was fun but the musical a letdown. McClure was very good but Danza could not sing nor dance. I adore all other scores by Brown but disappointed in this one. Also there were parts of the book that I just thought were too silly.

I was quite amazed with the very good reviews it received at Paper Mill.


reply to this message | reply to first message

re: i was very disappointed in the Paper Mill production

Posted by: enoch10 03:12 pm EST 11/22/14
In reply to: i was very disappointed in the Paper Mill production - bythesea2007 10:30 am EST 11/22/14

>> I was quite amazed with the very good reviews it received at Paper Mill.

if this thing turns out to be a stinker those reviews are really going to piss me off. i'm going with a group in a couple of weeks. i only buy in advance for group sales and went ahead with this one based solely on those reviews.

oh well, like the old saying goes, you buy a ticket and you take a chance. man, i sure wish i had waited on this one. at least the date is a couple of weeks away.


reply to this message | reply to first message

re: i was very disappointed in the Paper Mill production

Posted by: bythesea2007 03:26 pm EST 11/22/14
In reply to: re: i was very disappointed in the Paper Mill production - enoch10 03:12 pm EST 11/22/14

Well, the night I saw it at Paper Mill the audience was loving it. My friend and I looked at each other in amazement. four friends also saw the show there and were equally disappointed. I always thought Danza was suppose to be a good showman. Not when we saw it. But we are in the minority based on the audience responses when we were there.


reply to this message | reply to first message

re: on cold temperatures keeping people away etc.

Posted by: ryhog 10:24 am EST 11/22/14
In reply to: on cold temperatures keeping people away etc. - seeseveryshow 09:28 am EST 11/22/14

of course you are right. Aside from everything else, how would one explain the disparity with other shows whose audiences endured the same "cold temps" (by which we mean, to put it in context, temps bottoming out right around the freezing mark-not in single digits or accompanied by snow.


reply to this message | reply to first message

No Standing Ovation

Posted by: stan 08:54 am EST 11/22/14
In reply to: re: Honeymoon in Vegas tonight - lowwriter 12:31 am EST 11/22/14

Last night, the lady in front of my very good orch. TDF seat stood for a few seconds and then sat when she noticed that there were few supporters for her enthusiasm. I didn't mind the show, but it wasn't good. I actually thought it was kind of creepy ... starting with the pallor of Tony Danza's face to the strangeness of the meager dance numbers. The music, too, was bland with horrible lyrics. McClure was good, as was Brynn O'Malley. The only treat was Nancy Opel.


reply to this message | reply to first message

re: No Standing Ovation

Posted by: Shutterbug 10:51 am EST 11/22/14
In reply to: No Standing Ovation - stan 08:54 am EST 11/22/14

True that. Very few people standing during the curtain call.

I thought the production was amusing but a mixed bag overall. Nancy Opel steals the show. Rob McClure is fantastic as is David Josefsberg and Brynn O'Malley. Tony Danza, on the other hand, is no singer - and he has so many songs! Oy! I agree his make-up seemed too heavy and was not a flattering shade.

Also agree about the dancing - very pedestrian. You can see similar dancing in college productions all across the country.

The music was fine. Some of the slower numbers were rather bland, but the brassy numbers fit the mood and setting nicely.

JRB was in the house and taking notes.

If my budget or time only allowed for one such Broadway excursion, and I was in the mood for a fizzy, musical comedy...I would recommend ON THE TOWN over this show, no question.


reply to this message | reply to first message

Has Brantley made such a bad call previously?

Posted by: John_Patti 11:09 am EST 11/22/14
In reply to: re: No Standing Ovation - Shutterbug 10:51 am EST 11/22/14

I know we are not all crazy about some of his reviews or the way he approaches them. But has be ever been as off as he seems to be here? The only reason this came to NY was because of his review.


reply to this message | reply to first message

re: Has Brantley made such a bad call previously?

Posted by: nsguy45 07:41 pm EST 11/22/14
In reply to: Has Brantley made such a bad call previously? - John_Patti 11:09 am EST 11/22/14

Given the way Brantley raved about Fun Home in the NYT and on "Theater Talk", should the producers be concerned?


reply to this message | reply to first message

re: Has Brantley made such a bad call previously?

Posted by: ryhog 08:03 pm EST 11/22/14
In reply to: re: Has Brantley made such a bad call previously? - nsguy45 07:41 pm EST 11/22/14

those producers have lots of reasons to be concerned but a rave from Ben is not one of them. Sheesh. Do you people really think what you type on here?


reply to this message | reply to first message

re: Has Brantley made such a bad call previously?

Posted by: ryhog 11:15 am EST 11/22/14
In reply to: Has Brantley made such a bad call previously? - John_Patti 11:09 am EST 11/22/14

as has been rehearsed several times lately, Brantley was not some bizarre outlier on this show, and there were many highly enthusiastic reviews by respected posters here so it seems presumptuous to assume "we" would reach such a consensus.


reply to this message | reply to first message

re: Has Brantley made such a bad call previously?

Posted by: Delvino 12:50 pm EST 11/22/14
In reply to: re: Has Brantley made such a bad call previously? - ryhog 11:15 am EST 11/22/14

I well recall many entirely positive responses to the show. The consensus seemed to be: this is an old fashioned musical comedy, in the GUYS AND DOLLS tradition. Brantley's review of course translated readily into NYC consideration, but the critics seemed to have a helluva good time.


reply to this message | reply to first message


All That Chat is intended for the discussion of theatre news and opinion
subject to the terms and conditions of the Terms of Service. (Please take all off-topic discussion to private email.)

Please direct technical questions/comments to webmaster@talkinbroadway.com and policy questions to TBAdmin@talkinbroadway.com.

[ Home | On the Rialto | The Siegel Column | Cabaret | Tony Awards | Book Reviews | Great White Wayback Machine ]
[ Broadway Reviews | Barbara and Scott: The Two of Clubs | Sound Advice | Sound Advice Upcoming Releases CDs/Books/DVDs, etc. | Off Broadway | Funding Talkin' Broadway ]
[ Broadway 101 | Spotlight On | Talkin' Broadway | On the Boards | Regional | Talk to Us! | Search Talkin' Broadway ]

Terms of Service
[ © 1997 - 2014 www.TalkinBroadway.com, Inc. ]

Time to render: 0.098453 seconds.