HOME ALL THAT CHAT ATC WEST COAST SHOPPIN' RUSH BOARD FAQS

LOGIN REGISTER SEARCH THREADED MODE

not logged in

Threaded Order | Chronological Order

re: CATS - Why?

Posted by: sf 06:41 pm EST 11/24/14
In reply to: CATS - Why? - MarkBearSF 04:24 pm EST 11/23/14

The London production, believe it or not, was very charming.

It's a very slight show, though, and it doesn't (in my experience) work nearly as well in a traditional proscenium theatre as it did at the New London, however much they try to recreate the way that theatre was configured for the show elsewhere (the original London production was staged three-quarters in the round, in a theatre that's a little smaller than most of the West End theatres that are commonly used for musicals). The video, unfortunately, does not do the material very many favours.


reply to this message |

re: CATS - Why?

Posted by: Zelgo 11:31 pm EST 11/24/14
In reply to: re: CATS - Why? - sf 06:41 pm EST 11/24/14

CATS was extraordinarily original for its time--sung through, large sets, the first of the big European extravaganzas that dominated the 80's on Bway.

We can look at almost any show and wonder why it ran so long, but for its time, CATS was something very new to the Bway-going public.


reply to this message |


All That Chat is intended for the discussion of theatre news and opinion
subject to the terms and conditions of the Terms of Service. (Please take all off-topic discussion to private email.)

Please direct technical questions/comments to webmaster@talkinbroadway.com and policy questions to TBAdmin@talkinbroadway.com.

[ Home | On the Rialto | The Siegel Column | Cabaret | Tony Awards | Book Reviews | Great White Wayback Machine ]
[ Broadway Reviews | Barbara and Scott: The Two of Clubs | Sound Advice | Sound Advice Upcoming Releases CDs/Books/DVDs, etc. | Off Broadway | Funding Talkin' Broadway ]
[ Broadway 101 | Spotlight On | Talkin' Broadway | On the Boards | Regional | Talk to Us! | Search Talkin' Broadway ]

Terms of Service
[ © 1997 - 2014 www.TalkinBroadway.com, Inc. ]

Time to render: 0.023873 seconds.