| Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | Kerick 04:24 am EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| While I do agree that it is great what has been done with the casting of HAMILTON, I just saw it and don't know what all the shouting is about. It is very presentational with so much narrative (Aristotle: "Drama is in the form of action, not narrative.") The relentless pace and over-energized scenes eventually became a turn off. And about a third of the words were lost to the sound system garble. There were very few "scenes" of depth and drama... mostly they were short vignettes to move the plot along. Don' shoot. | |
| reply to this message | | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | RonAnnArbor 09:02 pm EST 11/02/15 |
| In reply to: | Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Kerick 04:24 am EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| So glad you spoke up- as there are plenty of us who didn't get this show's raves either... I hated the hiphop, though I liked some of the "songs", in particular Jonathan Groff's "You'll be Back" which I found to be the single song in the show I could listen to over again. Quite frankly, while I downloaded the cast album from iTunes for my complete collection of all musicals, I am never going to listen to it again, and I certainly wouldn't see the show again... BUT I would certainly recommend it to friends as a good evening of theatre -- good energy, creative staging, and an interesting story most of us have never heard about. Duels -- really?...and something new and original. I sat halfway back in the orchestra and have to say that I didn't get 75% of the rap dialogue either -- especially in Act I, though Act II did seem to both slow down dialogue wise, as well as tell its story more linearly and clearly. I felt bad for the Israeli vacationing family sitting next to me who bought tickets at a very high resale cost because they "heard it was the best thing in years"...They left at intermission because they didn't understand it. I totally agree that I didn't get the rave reviews -- Ironically, I shared my views with a friend who loves the show, and she spent an hour trying to "teach me" about how I should love hiphop and rap...um, no way. | |
| reply to this message | | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | ryhog 12:54 am EST 11/03/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - RonAnnArbor 09:02 pm EST 11/02/15 |
|
| |
| I can understand your reasoning. I hope you can understand that someone who loves rap (and that's a huge demographic, much larger than those who love musical theatre, no doubt) might have the same reaction in reverse when they are asked to sit through, say, Light in the Piazza. I think there has been the sense for a long time that musical theatre was hijacked by a small group of people with a particular affection for its traditional style of music, just is there has been a sense that American history was hijacked by the DAR set. I think a lot of people like the idea of musical theatre but couldn't abide its core. Hamilton, I think, attacks both of those things with gusto. There is another thread right now about people who hate musicals and make exceptions. I think what they hate (like what you hate in this instance, is the vehicle that has been driving it. Thanks for your POV. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | Zelgo 12:19 pm EST 11/02/15 |
| In reply to: | Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Kerick 04:24 am EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| Nothing could possibly live up to the hype. I was underwhelmed by The Producers, Spamalot, etc because of the hype. I saw HAMILTON just before the word of mouth got huge and I thought it was a work of genius. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | jero 09:40 pm EST 11/02/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Zelgo 12:19 pm EST 11/02/15 |
|
| |
| I thought In The Heights was a work of genius and I'm beginning to think with Hamilton, they seem to have settled in to (or stumbled across) a formula that worked and went with that... I can't put the thought into words yet but the slickness of the staging, choreography, the lighting (an entity in itself that is NOT subtle) seems to be a step back for me, not a step forward. I can't really articulate what I'm thinking so I should just shut up.. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | ryhog 01:36 pm EST 11/02/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Zelgo 12:19 pm EST 11/02/15 |
|
| |
| "Nothing could possibly live up to the hype." But (even assuming hype is the right word-I think it is not) many people have said here and elsewhere that, for them, it did live up to what they had heard, and then some. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| No | |
| Posted by: | pierce 01:14 am EST 11/02/15 |
| In reply to: | Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Kerick 04:24 am EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| You just didn't have the same response that many others have. No problem - different strokes for different folks. But for my part, I found much in the way of depth and drama in Hamilton - not to mention power, heart and brains. I love the show's inventiveness, and I love its energy level. Can't wait to see it again. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| LMM tends to get off key | |
| Posted by: | Kaoru 06:53 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Kerick 04:24 am EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| I know two people who didn't like the show. One didn't like the rap musical so it was unfortunate she spent her good money to see the show. The other person (who loved In The Heights) said both LMM and Leslie Odom Jr were off key and the person couldn't stand listening to it. (also, the person pointed out LMM only has two facial expression: anger and sadness) LMM was especially off key during "Hurricane." Now interesting thing is that I was at the same performance (different seat) and while I noticed that LMM sometimes was off key, it didn't bother me that much. For Leslie, he wasn't off key that much. It was discussed here about LMM and Javier's Hamilton and the consensus was Javilton is much better singer/actor. I saw both men and I agree but LMM brings more charisma. I enjoyed the show thoroughly both time too. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: LMM tends to get off key | |
| Posted by: | NeoAdamite 01:40 pm EST 11/02/15 |
| In reply to: | LMM tends to get off key - Kaoru 06:53 pm EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| The other person (who loved In The Heights) said both LMM and Leslie Odom Jr were off key and the person couldn't stand listening to it. I'm sorry you caught them on a bad day. In my experience Odom has excellent intonation and a very attractive sound. Miranda doesn't have a great voice, and his intonation can be shaky. But the part is written to avoid his limitations, much as Frank Loesser avoided taxing Sam Levene in GUYS AND DOLLS. Tolerance for wayward intonation is very personal. I once attended NEXT TO NORMAL with a cellist who's played in many Broadway shows, and we both agreed that while Ripley's singing often sounded wretched, her performance was still overwhelming. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: LMM tends to get off key | |
| Posted by: | PlayWiz 02:26 pm EST 11/02/15 |
| In reply to: | re: LMM tends to get off key - NeoAdamite 01:40 pm EST 11/02/15 |
|
| |
| Well, "Loesser avoided taxing Same Levene" by minimizing any singing he had to do; in fact, a duet was dropped between Nathan (Levene) and Sky Masterson called "Travelin' Light" because Levene couldn't sing it. Otherwise, Nathan's part is mostly an acting one, though he sings a bit in "Sue Me" and a few lines in "The Oldest Established", whereas Miranda has quite a lot of musical numbers in his show. I guess it's good that he's aware that he's better at rapping or speak-singing, as he was kind of difficult to listen to singing in the Encores "Merrily We Roll Along". | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: LMM tends to get off key | |
| Posted by: | NeoAdamite 03:40 pm EST 11/02/15 |
| In reply to: | re: LMM tends to get off key - PlayWiz 02:26 pm EST 11/02/15 |
|
| |
| I guess it's good that he's aware that he's better at rapping or speak-singing, as he was kind of difficult to listen to singing in the Encores "Merrily We Roll Along". That's exactly my point. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| "Sam" not "Same" nm | |
| Posted by: | PlayWiz 02:26 pm EST 11/02/15 |
| In reply to: | re: LMM tends to get off key - PlayWiz 02:26 pm EST 11/02/15 |
|
| |
| nm | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| another thing. maybe I didn't understand as much as I thought. SPOILER | |
| Posted by: | jero 05:29 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Kerick 04:24 am EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| I felt they glossed over where he got the money to pay the extortionist. it felt weird that it was suddenly a scandal. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: another thing. maybe I didn't understand as much as I thought. SPOILER | |
| Posted by: | hitbycab 06:20 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | another thing. maybe I didn't understand as much as I thought. SPOILER - jero 05:29 pm EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| do you think more reviews like this will bring down the seat price to $1000???? here's hoping... | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| A Tale of Two Acts | |
| Posted by: | Logan69 02:51 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Kerick 04:24 am EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| I went in to it very skeptical that I'd like it. I'm a fan now--of Act II, which was 90% intelligible. Act I might as well have been in rapid-fire Latin for all I comprehended. (I got the big picture but not many of the lyrics.) Was impressed by the marvelous wood-scaffolding set. Visually stunning, especially from the front Mezz. I'll advise friends not to sit too close for this one. Maybe someone will translate Act 1 for me someday. Liked it; didn't love it. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | ptownguy 12:50 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Kerick 04:24 am EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| I totally agree with you. I was in the rear mezzanine and could not understand a lot of the lyrics. I was expecting to see the greatest show ever. It was good but I really don't think it lives up to all of the hype. I know I'm in a minority -- maybe I was expecting too much due to all of the raves. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | jero 12:06 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Kerick 04:24 am EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| as to scenes with depth and drama. i felt that way too. when Eliza sobbed over the body of her son, in the complete silence, it seemed so out of place it got a laugh out of me. apologies but it blurted out | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| i'm right there with you. sorry long | |
| Posted by: | jero 12:02 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Kerick 04:24 am EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| my theater going cohort and i had 2 things to say in unison before i told her to get out of my head. the first was "heartless" and the second "fierce" in regards to that blonde dancer. the dance style now seems 'slick' to me :frenetic but pointless and didnt come near to creating a mood or futhering the story like in the heights did for me (thats a generalization bcs i liked some of it-the eye of hurricane comes to mind). Hamilton's choreography felt like a step backwards. speaking of in the heights , fr me the musical similarities became grating and annoying and i missed the soaring voices ITH intertwined. for me act one was interminable but things picked up when jefferson got back from france. i liked the rap throwdowns with mics. i thought angelica was awesome. the 30 yearsvof history felt like a history lesson. so much talking at me. im also wondering how much seeing hamilton back to back with Allegiance colored my perceptions. the heart , the crushing acting in that show and the glorious voices are what i prefer. those elements were present in In The Heights but not as evident here. that said im really glad it will draw flocks of people to the theater. but i wont be seeing it again. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: i'm right there with you. sorry long | |
| Posted by: | MikeR 01:08 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | i'm right there with you. sorry long - jero 12:02 pm EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| You are, of course, allowed your opinion. But I simply cannot understand how anyone could sit through "Burn," "It's Quiet Uptown," "The World Was Wide Enough," and "Who Lives, Who Dies, Who Tells Your Story" and call the show "heartless." That statement literally makes no sense to me. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: i'm right there with you. sorry long | |
| Posted by: | Michael_Portantiere 02:46 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | re: i'm right there with you. sorry long - MikeR 01:08 pm EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| 'You are, of course, allowed your opinion. But I simply cannot understand how anyone could sit through "Burn," "It's Quiet Uptown," "The World Was Wide Enough," and "Who Lives, Who Dies, Who Tells Your Story" and call the show "heartless." That statement literally makes no sense to me.' Nor to me. And it's hard to comprehend how anyone could react to the death of Hamilton's son with laughter. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| more spoilers | |
| Posted by: | jero 06:09 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | re: i'm right there with you. sorry long - Michael_Portantiere 02:46 pm EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| and I'm sorry but the laugh burst out of me. I was that disengaged. I saw allegiance in the afternoon. SPOILERS... the grandfather's death was devastating in its design and the musical scoring it,, you felt his soul join his ancestors.. It was as powerful as WIT. there's another death that was just as shocking. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: i'm right there with you. sorry long | |
| Posted by: | jero 05:00 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | re: i'm right there with you. sorry long - Michael_Portantiere 02:46 pm EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| maybe my seat was too far away so I may have missed the finer points of the actors.(orchestra row w) .... I went in cold, not knowing songs and while I enjoyed many songs they just didn't snag my heart . maybe I missed the stakes. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| Kerick, talk less. Smile more. | |
| Posted by: | manchurch03104 09:37 am EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Kerick 04:24 am EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| :) | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | ryhog 08:59 am EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Kerick 04:24 am EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| As others have said, nothing is liked by everyone and not liking something that most like requires no apology. That said, there is not "so much narrative" in absolute terms, and besides, since when do we pretend Aristotle defines and constrains what we do on a stage? I am surprised you did not recognize the depth and drama in the show's scenes because I think one of the show's hallmarks is that it manages so much of both across so wide a spectrum. (This is not a show in which the characters are a parade of cardboard cutouts.) I skipped over your pacing and energy comment because I think that is what many love about the show, but it is also something subjective. And I suppose so is how well each of us hears. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | Delvino 11:50 am EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - ryhog 08:59 am EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| Spot on analysis, every word. EVITA is perhaps predominately narrative, via Che, while HAMILTON carves up the action into scenes of every size and shape, and daringly even offers two takes on the same events, in record time. It begins with a point of access provided by an unreliable narrator, the compassionately drawn antagonist of Burr, shifts to the POVs of others, and still manages to burrow deep into the introspection of the title character. All the while showing, rather than telling. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | ryhog 12:18 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Delvino 11:50 am EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| A few more observations. The opening song provides the context, pre-history, setting of the play in what could be called narrative or presentational form. Not unlike what a chorus does in the Greeks, or a prologue does in Shakespeare. Burr's periodic "narration" is actually something else entirely. It is an ongoing illumination of what he is thinking as his character evolves. And that arc is totally story and totally drama and totally necessary. There is another place where I have read comments that there is "commenting" and that's in It's Quiet Uptown. But what is being said by others there is in character-based on what they were observing, not some external editorializing by LMM. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | Michael_Portantiere 03:32 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - ryhog 12:18 pm EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| It does seem to me that some of the criticism of HAMILTON is all about people trying to make themselves sound intelligent, and has no basis in the actual show. A critique has no value if it contains factually inaccurate statements about the content of a show -- for example, the comment here about the show being "heartless," and the critique of one reviewer that the Hamilton character as written and played is a cipher whose motivations are unclear. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | Chromolume 09:40 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Michael_Portantiere 03:32 pm EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| A critique has no value if it contains factually inaccurate statements about the content of a show -- for example, the comment here about the show being "heartless"... But "heartless" is an opinion, not a question of fact. You (and many of us) may not agree with that assessment of the show, but if the poster feels that the show has no heart, that's his/her opinion. I've heard people say things like that, time to time, about shows I personally find very moving. (Some of the Sondheim shows, for instance.) It's hard to convince someone that a show has "heart" if it doesn't move them emotionally. But that's the beauty and mystery of art - we all see it differently. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | Michael_Portantiere 11:49 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Chromolume 09:40 pm EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| "But 'heartless' is an opinion, not a question of fact." I know what you mean, but so much of HAMILTON is concerned with the characters' emotions about what's happening that I don't understand how anyone can hold the opinion that the show is "heartless." Even if someone thinks those emotions somehow feel false -- and I can't understand that, either -- I don't believe "heartless" is the word to use. The same goes for Sondheim's shows. And I suspect the people who find those shows heartless are the same ones who think "Sondheim can't write a melody." Yes, it's an opinion that Sondheim can't write a melody, but any opinion needs some basis in factual reality. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | Chromolume 12:13 am EST 11/02/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Michael_Portantiere 11:49 pm EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| Well, I think it comes down to semantics. "Sondheim can't write a melody" isn't factual, but "I don't hear satisfying melodies in Sondheim's shows" is opinion. "Heartless" may go against what you see as the substance of Hamilton but "I don't feel the heart in it" is an entitled opinion, even if you can't understand how someone would say that. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | Michael_Portantiere 10:57 am EST 11/02/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Chromolume 12:13 am EST 11/02/15 |
|
| |
| "'Heartless' may go against what you see as the substance of Hamilton but 'I don't feel the heart in it' is an entitled opinion, even if you can't understand how someone would say that." Fair enough, but I think there's quite a big difference between saying a show is "heartless" and saying "I don't feel the heart in it." Someone might say, "I wasn't moved by A CHORUS LINE because I don't relate to the characters," but would anyone ever describe that show as "heartless?" So I think you're right that it comes down to semantics, but also, I think it's a good thing to be careful in choosing one's words, especially when being critical of something. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | jero 09:47 pm EST 11/02/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Michael_Portantiere 10:57 am EST 11/02/15 |
|
| |
| I'm still analyzing how I feel and think... and my heartless comment.... well for me a show has heart when I'm made to feel what the actors are feeling.. I'm not hearing about or being told about what they're going through, I feel with them... it's not the same thing as a character having convictions but it's similar. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | Michael_Portantiere 11:43 pm EST 11/02/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - jero 09:47 pm EST 11/02/15 |
|
| |
| Although there is quite a bit of narration in HAMILTON, and several instances of characters telling us what happens or has happened offstage, there are also a great many scenes of characters experiencing emotions in the moment as events are occurring. If you were "not made to feel what the actors are feeling" (I think you meant the characters), that's your experience and it's valid, but your description of the storytelling is misleading. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | jero 05:03 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Michael_Portantiere 03:32 pm EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| funny you should mention "people trying to make themselves sound intelligent." there were people around me snorting with laughter at almost every little bit of wit. I figured they knew people in the cast. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | ryhog 05:51 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - jero 05:03 pm EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| now you are just sounding like someone who is carping because others liked something more than you did. I was with you up to this point, because I can understand how a show can simply not resonate for someone, whether it is because of style, subject matter or whatever. I've been there many times. I am also the guy who has said hundreds of times that theatre has to resonate over a broad spectrum to succeed. That doesn't mean it has to succeed for everyone, and perhaps now you can understand what I mean when I say that shows with my grandmother's music hardly ever resonate for me. I don't think you will deny that this show is succeeding over a broad spectrum, and not because everyone knows someone in the cast. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | jero 07:30 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - ryhog 05:51 pm EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| I'll stop ( I hope) but I don't think I'm carping, just putting out there what was going on in my mind at the time. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | ryhog 09:55 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - jero 07:30 pm EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| I have no problem with hearing what's in your mind. My problem was when you started telling us about the motivations of the folks sitting around you. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | Ann 03:57 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Michael_Portantiere 03:32 pm EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| ... some of the criticism of HAMILTON is all about people trying to make themselves sound intelligent But everyone's allowed to have their own opinion, right? If there ever was a show that isn't permitted to be criticized, it's this one. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | Michael_Portantiere 05:30 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Ann 03:57 pm EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| It is "permissible" to criticize the show. Some people think there's too much rap in the show (or don't like rap at all), or they don't like the types of near-rhymes used in lyrics, or they feel it's sometimes hard to keep up with the story because so many words are being sung or spoken so quickly. Those are all valid opinions based on the actual show. But it seems to me, as to ryhog, that some of the criticisms here aren't supported by anything in the writing. I guess you could say that's my opinion, but since I'm talking about what is or is not present in the content of the show, to me it's much more objective than subjective. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | Ann 10:34 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Michael_Portantiere 05:30 pm EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| From your other comments, it seems these things you refer to as being in the content are subjective eye-of-the-beholder things, not facts. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | ryhog 06:05 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Michael_Portantiere 05:30 pm EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| I think the point may be that content does not "land" the same for everyone, and that is where the subjectivity comes in. I know that's the case for me. There are shows that are liked generally that just absolutely don't work for me. And I think that most of the regulars here have expressed exactly the same thing at one time or another. If something blows right by you without being absorbed, in your reality, it is not there, even through it is certainly in the script. And while we kinda hope critics are picking up most all of the content, even that is not always the case. I also think that sometimes what resonates depends on our own background. Will Hamilton mean as much to a person from another country? We don't know yet. I have a friend who remarked the other day that he wondered if Hamilton would be viewed differently by someone who has never been on the subway in New York. that's a good question too. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | Michael_Portantiere 12:02 am EST 11/02/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - ryhog 06:05 pm EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| "I think the point may be that content does not 'land' the same for everyone, and that is where the subjectivity comes in." Again, very well phrased, and very cogent. I would say that Hamilton's motivations, for example, are definitely present in the text of the show, but it's possible that they just don't "land" for certain audience members -- whether because those people have trouble hearing some of the lyrics, or aren't paying full attention, or don't understand what's being said, or maybe just because they don't think the writing is effective in those sections. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | jero 06:38 am EST 11/02/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Michael_Portantiere 12:02 am EST 11/02/15 |
|
| |
| Any comments on WHY someone might not be 'paying full attention?" theoretically? | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | ryhog 09:30 am EST 11/02/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - jero 06:38 am EST 11/02/15 |
|
| |
| There are more possible reasons than there are founding fathers. They can range from the unrelated (sick, tired, angry, drunk, etc.) to the related (disinterested in subject, don't like the music, prefer shows that entertain without requiring so much attention, etc.) | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | jero 11:01 am EST 11/02/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - ryhog 09:30 am EST 11/02/15 |
|
| |
| how about boredom? for me, I liked the music. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | ryhog 01:47 pm EST 11/02/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - jero 11:01 am EST 11/02/15 |
|
| |
| I think both of the other "related" examples I gave speak to boredom. Boredom, of course, can also be a personal problem. Teachers will tell you that even the most un-boring teachers bore students in two categories-those too dumb for the subject matter and those too smart for it. (And I am not in the least suggesting you fall in either of those categories.) | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | Delvino 12:30 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - ryhog 12:18 pm EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| Such an important observation. Part of the poignant brilliance of "It's Quiet Uptown" is the use of Angelica as the access to this family's grief. In an interesting way, the verses are part of an overall arc for Angelica, as she is estranged from Alexander during the Reynolds affair, and then must mend her own heart as she relays the mending of the even more deeply broken hearts of Alexander and Eliza. I daresay, "It's Quiet Uptown" wouldn't be as powerful without Angelica's gravitas, and the eloquent words she sings are in sync with here demonstrated intellect and compassion (in contemporary parlance, perhaps her emotional I.Q.) elsewhere in the show. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | jero 05:10 pm EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Delvino 12:30 pm EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| 'she relays the mending of the even more deeply broken hearts of A and E." with 'eloquent words.' So are you saying a secondary character informed me of the rending of the relationship and the depth of their pain? If so , that might be why I wasn't drawn in to Hamilton as so many were. I prefer to be swept to that painful place with lush orchestrations and severe acting and for whatever reason, I didn't experience that. I bought the cd (before I went in) and intend on listening so maybe I'll soften up on it. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| The orchestrations is "Hamilton" | |
| Posted by: | Delvino 09:30 pm EST 11/02/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - jero 05:10 pm EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| Are exquisite. The piano prelude in "It's Quiet Uptown" is simply perfection. So haunting, eloquent. Musical theater at its simplest and most evocative. Perfect, and not in any way less than the form demands. But listen to "Take a Break." This score is in many ways very traditional. Yes, I said it. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: The orchestrations is "Hamilton" | |
| Posted by: | jero 09:52 pm EST 11/02/15 |
| In reply to: | The orchestrations is "Hamilton" - Delvino 09:30 pm EST 11/02/15 |
|
| |
| I've started to listen... i think 6 of the first 9 songs end with the same button. it's annoying... by the way save your money on the cd.. I bought it thinking there would be show pics and tidbits in the packaging... but the only thing in the booklets are the lyrics.. not a photo.. NOTHING. just down load it... | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | ashleylm 02:24 pm EST 11/02/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - jero 05:10 pm EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| I prefer to be swept to that painful place with lush orchestrations and severe acting Did you see Dr Zhivago? Sounds right up your alley. Painful, lush, and severe, lots of emotion all over the place, not remotely Brechtian. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | Michael_Portantiere 10:01 am EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - ryhog 08:59 am EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| Very well phrased, ryhog. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | NeoAdamite 07:48 am EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Kerick 04:24 am EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| Aristotle That's a problem already: this is Brechtian, and thus explicitly non-Aristotelian drama. It allows that history might have turned out differently. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | boyartist 07:42 am EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Kerick 04:24 am EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| Kerick, you are not alone. I think "Hamilton" is important for the growth and survival of the musical theatre, but in my opinion it is far from a great show. I enjoyed it's energy and innovation, but my personal test for a great show is, would I want to see it again? No. However, you and I seem to be in the minority. It does make me feel encouraged that Broadway can produce such excitement, and that the Public Theatre has another money maker. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| While I have not seen it yet ... | |
| Posted by: | jdm 06:00 am EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Kerick 04:24 am EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| many beloved shows (or shows we are told to love!) have naysayers. I never "got" Rent, liked Fun Home but do head scratches at the adoration, felt similar to The Producers and Book of Mormon. And yet when I saw Something Rotten! in previews, I said this is the show that will be a sellout for 5+ years. Go figure. Jim | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | JayBee 05:59 am EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Kerick 04:24 am EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| Don't speak. Don't speak. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| You seem to have missed... | |
| Posted by: | gad90210 05:08 am EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Kerick 04:24 am EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| Thirty tumultuous years of American history, including a wedding, three duels, a revolution (the Battle of Yorktown), an affair, blackmail, a couple of spirited debates, promises kept and promises broken, and the birth of a nation. I saw more than enough action on that stage for five shows! I'm sorry you couldn't make out all the words; I had no trouble hearing everything. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: Did I miss something at HAMILTON? | |
| Posted by: | TGWW 04:48 am EST 11/01/15 |
| In reply to: | Did I miss something at HAMILTON? - Kerick 04:24 am EST 11/01/15 |
|
| |
| You may now leave the room without supper. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
All That Chat is intended for the discussion of
theatre news and opinion
subject to the terms and conditions of the Terms of Service. (Please take all off-topic discussion to private email.)
Please direct technical questions/comments to webmaster@talkinbroadway.com and policy questions to TBAdmin@talkinbroadway.com.
[ Home | On the Rialto | The Siegel Column | Cabaret | Tony Awards | Book Reviews | Great White Wayback Machine ]
[ Broadway Reviews | Barbara and Scott: The Two of Clubs | Sound Advice | Sound Advice Upcoming Releases CDs/Books/DVDs, etc. | Off Broadway | Funding Talkin' Broadway ]
[ Broadway 101 | Spotlight On | Talkin' Broadway | On the Boards | Regional | Talk to Us! | Search Talkin' Broadway ]
Terms of Service
[ © 1997 - 2015 www.TalkinBroadway.com, Inc. ]
Time to render: 0.834112 seconds.