HOME ALL THAT CHAT ATC WEST COAST SHOPPIN' RUSH BOARD FAQS

LOGIN REGISTER SEARCH FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: "On Your Feet"...Six feet under

Posted by: Michael_Portantiere 01:07 pm EST 11/03/15
In reply to: re: "On Your Feet"...Six feet under - Ann 09:42 am EST 11/03/15

I agree. Deciding that an opposite meaning of a word is acceptable as an alternate meaning just because so many people use the word incorrectly is stupid, and it sets a dangerous precedent.

There are a few other words with definitions that are very different from one another, if not exactly opposite. "Moot" is one that comes to mind. This sort of thing has always bothered me, and will continue to, I'm sure :-(


reply |

Previous: re: "On Your Feet"...Six feet under - Ann 09:42 am EST 11/03/15
Next: re: "On Your Feet"...Six feet under - Ann 01:54 pm EST 11/03/15

Thread:


All That Chat is intended for the discussion of theatre news and opinion
subject to the terms and conditions of the Terms of Service. (Please take all off-topic discussion to private email.)

Please direct technical questions/comments to webmaster@talkinbroadway.com and policy questions to TBAdmin@talkinbroadway.com.

[ Home | On the Rialto | The Siegel Column | Cabaret | Tony Awards | Book Reviews | Great White Wayback Machine ]
[ Broadway Reviews | Barbara and Scott: The Two of Clubs | Sound Advice | Sound Advice Upcoming Releases CDs/Books/DVDs, etc. | Off Broadway | Funding Talkin' Broadway ]
[ Broadway 101 | Spotlight On | Talkin' Broadway | On the Boards | Regional | Talk to Us! | Search Talkin' Broadway ]

Terms of Service
[ © 1997 - 2015 www.TalkinBroadway.com, Inc. ]

Time to render: 0.001860 seconds.