Menu
Home page
About/Contact
All that chat Main
Atc shoppin'
On the boards
Broadway reviews
Off Broadway reviews
Regional reviews
» Albuquerque
» Boston
» Chicago
» Cincinnati
» Cleveland & Akron
» Connecticut & the Berkshires
» Florida - Southern
» Florida - West Coast
» Las Vegas
» Los Angeles
» Minneapolis/St. Paul
» New Jersey
» Philadelphia
» Phoenix
» Raleigh/Durham
» San Diego
» San Francisco/North Bay
» San Jose/Silicon Valley
» Seattle
» St. Louis
» Washington, D.C.
Sound advice cd reviews
Sound advice new/upcoming list
Tony Awards
What's new on the rialto?
Archives
Search All That Chat
LOG IN / REGISTER
Log in
Register
Share:
LOG IN / REGISTER
Log in
Register
ATC Main
Newest Posts
FLAT MODE
SHOPPIN'
On the Boards
re: It worked for Judy Holiday but not for Carol Channing
Posted by:
BroadwayTonyJ
07:37 pm EDT 06/29/17
In reply to:
re: It worked for Judy Holiday but not for Carol Channing
-
BruceinIthaca
04:51 pm EDT 06/29/17
I agree. It should have been Channing, and the film should have been budgeted more modestly. What would you think about Jackie Gleason opposite Channing as Vandergelder? He might have wanted "Penny in My Pocket" put back in.
reply
Previous:
re: It worked for Judy Holiday but not for Carol Channing
-
BruceinIthaca
04:51 pm EDT 06/29/17
Next:
re: It worked for Judy Holiday but not for Carol Channing
-
whereismikeyfl
01:49 pm EDT 06/30/17
Thread:
re: It worked for Judy Holiday but not for Carol Channing
-
whereismikeyfl
01:49 pm EDT 06/30/17
(1)
re: It worked for Judy Holiday but not for Carol Channing
-
AlanScott
11:19 pm EDT 06/30/17
Privacy Policy
Time to render: 0.014051 seconds.