Threaded Order Chronological Order
| re: The new expectation: Not artistic standards but consumer demands. | |
| Posted by: Ann 09:07 pm EDT 07/03/17 | |
| In reply to: re: The new expectation: Not artistic standards but consumer demands. - Delvino 09:04 pm EDT 07/03/17 | |
|
|
|
| Well, there were theatre message boards 15 years ago ;) (and, honestly, we've had a few threads started by people posting similar complaints about stage door behavior, though it's been awhile.) | |
| reply to this message |
| The rarefied niche of board is not Twitter. | |
| Last Edit: Delvino 09:12 pm EDT 07/03/17 | |
| Posted by: Delvino 09:11 pm EDT 07/03/17 | |
| In reply to: re: The new expectation: Not artistic standards but consumer demands. - Ann 09:07 pm EDT 07/03/17 | |
|
|
|
| Sorry, I don't think there's any comparison in being able to post negatives in a niche/bubble, and public postings with (quantifiable:) thousands of readers, cross-referencing and even ad hominem communiques. I can attack a star here, and the star and even most of his or her fans may never know. I can attack the same star on Twitter, and it's news in seconds. Witness, this story. | |
| reply to this message |
| It was different 15 years ago | |
| Last Edit: Ann 11:34 pm EDT 07/03/17 | |
| Posted by: Ann 11:27 pm EDT 07/03/17 | |
| In reply to: The rarefied niche of board is not Twitter. - Delvino 09:11 pm EDT 07/03/17 | |
|
|
|
| ... or even a little later when we were threatened by a Broadway star with legal action because of something someone posted here. But, really, I did include a smiley on purpose. It wasn't even close to the magnitude of Twitter. |
|
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| I forget. My sincere apology. | |
| Posted by: Delvino 07:35 am EDT 07/04/17 | |
| In reply to: It was different 15 years ago - Ann 11:27 pm EDT 07/03/17 | |
|
|
|
| I was rather humorless in the whole thread, or came off that way, and I apologize. (One of the hardest things to get right: tone.) My attempt to split a hair over the difference between boards/blogs and Twitter -- to you! -- was especially presumptuous and entirely laughable. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
Time to render: 0.014225 seconds.