| re: '1776' film reviews: Historically applauded or panned? |
| Posted by: JereNYC (JereNYC@aol.com) 01:01 pm EDT 07/05/17 |
| In reply to: re: '1776' film reviews: Historically applauded or panned? - Michael_Portantiere 12:30 pm EDT 07/05/17 |
|
I don't even think Richard Henry Lee is portrayed as a fool, clodhopping or not. Lee is young and enthusiastic and has an energy and connections that neither Adams nor Franklin possess. I think they respect him, and know that he can come through for them (which he does), even if he may not be their own personal cup of tea.
Nothing that Adams or Franklin say at any point indicates that they think he's a fool or don't like him. They're just different kinds of people and Lee's natural exuberance makes them at little uncomfortable. |
|
reply
|
|
| Previous: |
re: '1776' film reviews: Historically applauded or panned? - Michael_Portantiere 03:35 pm EDT 07/06/17 |
| Next: |
re: '1776' film reviews: Historically applauded or panned? - Michael_Portantiere 01:05 pm EDT 07/05/17 |
| Thread: |
|
