| re: INDECENT questions: MAJOR SPOILERS and way too long |
| Posted by: wizrdofoz27 11:45 am EDT 07/08/17 |
| In reply to: INDECENT questions: MAJOR SPOILERS and way too long - lordofspeech 11:01 am EDT 07/08/17 |
|
To all your "was this actor playing X and Y supposed to be playing different characters?" I'm pretty sure the answer is usually yes. I loved all the multiple part-playing in this play, though I see how it could have been confusing. I think there was some continuity in the play, and it wasn't confusing to me - they seemed to do a good job of introducing each new character as they entered the story.
I don't know how much of the play was real, or how much was made up. I didn't see the play presenting itself as a documentary - I'm sorry if you went into it expecting that. I thought it was a fictional play based on true events.
To your last question, the point of the play was whatever you walked away from it thinking about. Does every play have to have a cleanly-put 'point'? |
|
reply
|
|
| Previous: |
re: INDECENT questions: MAJOR SPOILERS and way too long - ryhog 02:06 pm EDT 07/08/17 |
| Next: |
re: INDECENT questions: MAJOR SPOILERS and way too long - TheOtherOne 11:39 am EDT 07/08/17 |
| Thread: |
|
