| re: INDECENT questions: MAJOR SPOILERS and way too long |
| Posted by: ryhog 12:52 pm EDT 07/08/17 |
| In reply to: INDECENT questions: MAJOR SPOILERS and way too long - lordofspeech 11:01 am EDT 07/08/17 |
|
| I think what your post and some of the responses tell us is that some people are more fond of literality than others. And some care more about the minutiae than the big picture. There is nothing wrong with that; the same things don't appeal to all of us in the design of a play any more than in, say, the design of our living rooms. Collaterally, some folks like clear resolutions whereas others like plays that leave things to the viewer's imagination. To me this is a play that (to its credit), despite having an obvious intention and point of view, does not beat a singular point into the audiences' heads. I've always thought that Paula's plays (and a sizable percentage of off-B and off-off plays) work best for those who can relax at the theatre. I don't think that's your style. I'm curious, if you go to a museum, MOMA or the Met? |
|
reply
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Reading the projections is key - eatstake 06:46 pm EDT 07/08/17 |
| Next: |
re: INDECENT questions: MAJOR SPOILERS and way too long - TheOtherOne 01:40 pm EDT 07/08/17 |
| Thread: |
|
