| But as noted, they did NOT market their star. Thus, the baffling chain of decisions. | |
| Last Edit: Delvino 09:06 pm EDT 08/06/17 | |
| Posted by: Delvino 09:05 pm EDT 08/06/17 | |
| In reply to: re: In the words of "Curtains" and "Matilda" - NYCscribe 08:28 pm EDT 08/06/17 | |
|
|
|
| "I think they were right to market their star, but they should have had a suitable replacement lined up." Except, as many of us pointed out, and often, they didn't market their star, once they show moved into the winter of 2017, when Groban had a run til 7/2 to play out. The recording didn't drop til close to the Tonys. And they began pushing Oak in early February. Oddly enough, had they pushed Groban more, they might've been able to find a replacement. Someone who could move into a nice spotlight. The spotlight was denied. They felt the spotlight belonged on the show, not a star. The rest is history. |
|
| reply | |
|
|
|
| Previous: | Anthony Ramos, you mean? - Seth Christenfeld 01:14 pm EDT 08/07/17 |
| Next: | re: But as noted, they did NOT market their star. Thus, the baffling chain of decisions. - Ann 10:03 pm EDT 08/06/17 |
| Thread: |
|
Time to render: 0.023339 seconds.