| re: But as noted, they did NOT suffiently market their star. Thus, the baffling chain of decisions. |
| Posted by: Delvino 11:31 am EDT 08/07/17 |
| In reply to: re: But as noted, they did NOT market their star. Thus, the baffling chain of decisions. - NYCscribe 10:28 am EDT 08/07/17 |
|
I saw the ads, almost daily. He was MIA. Winter of 2017, almost six months of Groban's run ahead of him.
This post, elsewhere, says what I and others have said in these threads, slightly differently, but makes the same point:
"Groban kept the show from drowning, but the fact that he left it after a healthy run with an enormous hill left to climb to recoupment tells us that the double whammy here was that the production was designed to fail, and then marketed to give it no chance. I don't know that Groban could ever have matched Midler as a draw, but they did not even try to give it a shot at that."
That is the what I've tried to articulate. |
|
reply
|
|
| Previous: |
re: But as noted, they did NOT market their star. Thus, the baffling chain of decisions. - NYCscribe 10:28 am EDT 08/07/17 |
| Next: |
re: But as noted, they did NOT market their star. Thus, the baffling chain of decisions. - Delvino 10:24 am EDT 08/07/17 |
| Thread: |
|
