| re: Patinkin committing to 3 months might've helped, 3 weeks, not so much. |
| Posted by: Michael_Portantiere 11:06 pm EDT 08/08/17 |
| In reply to: re: Patinkin committing to 3 months might've helped, 3 weeks, not so much. - Delvino 10:53 pm EDT 08/08/17 |
|
| Along with others who have posted here, I could not understand how any boost at the box office during Patinkin's THREE WEEK run could have made up for, let alone greatly exceeded, the costs involved in putting him into the show for so short a period, including but not limited to the fact that the producers would presumably have had to pay TWO star salaries (to Oak and Patinkin) during that period. |
|
reply
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Patinkin committing to 3 months might've helped, 3 weeks, not so much. - ryhog 12:58 am EDT 08/09/17 |
| Next: |
re: Patinkin committing to 3 months might've helped, 3 weeks, not so much. - sirpupnyc 11:32 pm EDT 08/08/17 |
| Thread: |
|
