| re: PRINCE OF BROADWAY ... |
| Posted by: AlanScott 12:55 am EDT 08/09/17 |
| In reply to: re: PRINCE OF BROADWAY ... - hugoP 10:50 pm EDT 08/08/17 |
|
| I don't think there's anything in it that's unlikely for a woman who would have been in her early 50s in 1971 to have lived through. People did stuff young back then. It would not have rasied eyebrows for a girl of 13 or 14 to have danced in her scanties in the 1930s. A wealthy financier might well have had a teenaged mistress, a girl of 17 or 18. |
|
reply
|
|
| Previous: |
re: PRINCE OF BROADWAY ... - hugoP 10:50 pm EDT 08/08/17 |
| Next: |
re: PRINCE OF BROADWAY ... - WaymanWong 12:01 pm EDT 08/08/17 |
| Thread: |
|
