LOG IN / REGISTER



Threaded Order Chronological Order

re: Interesting way a theater company reacted to criticism over making unauthorized cuts
Last Edit: Chromolume 11:54 am EDT 08/11/17
Posted by: Chromolume 11:53 am EDT 08/11/17
In reply to: Interesting way a theater company reacted to criticism over making unauthorized cuts - Ann 09:36 am EDT 08/11/17

Audiences attending the Shelton Theater summer production of were greeted with a program note from director Richard Ciccarone explaining the artistic reasoning behind his decision to “transform” Guirgis’ play.
"For me, a play is a living document that should transform from production to production."


What Ciccarone seems to be conveniently forgetting is that such a "transformation" potentially happens in any new production, with new actors, new designs, new direction, etc. The text does not need to be rewritten/altered for that to happen.
reply to this message


re: Interesting way a theater company reacted to criticism over making unauthorized cuts
Posted by: ryhog 12:19 pm EDT 08/11/17
In reply to: re: Interesting way a theater company reacted to criticism over making unauthorized cuts - Chromolume 11:53 am EDT 08/11/17

"The text does not need to be rewritten/altered for that to happen."

Nothing in the theatre is needed. A production is not needed to begin with. I don't think need is the issue; it is benefit, and who is to say that a show will not benefit from an alteration that has not been seen. I think this over-capitalistic mentality is bad for the theatre.

It is well to remember that Shakespeare flourished a century before the Statute of Anne, and perhaps ironically, may have been the greatest pirate of the literary works of others in the history of the theatre.
reply to this message


Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.008753 seconds.