| re: Interesting way a theater company reacted to criticism over making unauthorized cuts - Federal Copyright? | |
| Last Edit: ryhog 11:32 am EDT 08/12/17 | |
| Posted by: ryhog 11:31 am EDT 08/12/17 | |
| In reply to: re: Interesting way a theater company reacted to criticism over making unauthorized cuts - Federal Copyright? - Cainebj 10:54 am EDT 08/12/17 | |
|
|
|
| you are completely wrong. First of all, it is not an empty threat at all, as proven here. Secondly, you are conflating what is a good idea artistically (as to which I agree) and what is permissible without the consent of the property owner. The law is clear on the latter, and the theatre and director have no defensible position on this. Of course you have seen deconstructions, but what makes you think they were not undertaken with consent? There are a lot of things you can do most of the time with impunity in this world even though they are illegal. That does not make them right, and only a fool tests this when they have invested thousands of dollars in a production. When I read your post I thought you were joking. |
|
| reply | |
|
|
|
| Previous: | re: Interesting way a theater company reacted to criticism over making unauthorized cuts - Federal Copyright? - whereismikeyfl 01:37 pm EDT 08/12/17 |
| Next: | re: Interesting way a theater company reacted to criticism over making unauthorized cuts - Federal Copyright? - Cainebj 08:36 am EDT 08/13/17 |
| Thread: |
|
Time to render: 0.012117 seconds.