As for what that voice says, donít expect to pin down any specific ideology. As with his last play seen in New York, The Pain and the Itch (2006), its target isnít so much any specific idea as it is their always-flawed proponents. Here, as there, it can be boiled down to, approximately: say-everything, do-too-much liberals that are too busy helping others to realize the damage theyíre inflicting. The sympathetic cock of the head can be heard and felt in every line of dialogue: Norris doesnít hate these people, he just hates that they present their own hate as love. And that gives him endless ammunition.
That he appropriates the titular neighborhood and the borderline-sadistic homeownersí association from Hansberry is not accidental, but itís almost incidental. The Youngers are never mentioned directly, and spoken of indirectly only in passing, disconnected tones. The pieces are yours to assemble or leave in the box as you wish - the picture they form may provide more context for a story that oscillates between the first actís 1959 (the year A Raisin in the Sun opened on Broadway) and the second actís 2009, but are required for neither the copious enlightenment or entertainment that Norris and his director, Pam MacKinnon, have planned.
It all begins in the style of a Leave it to BeaverĖlike sitcom, projecting a view of domestic bliss that canít survive even a momentary glimpse of sunshine. Russ (Frank Wood) and his wife Bev (Christina Kirk) are preparing to move out of their home, aided by their maid Francine (Crystal A. Dickinson) and her husband Albert (Damon Gupton). Thereís the expected complement of kooky friends and neighbors: Jim, a priest (Brendan Griffin); Karl (Jeremy Shamos), and his wife Betsy (Annie Parisse), who happens to be deaf. And as each appears and establishes himself or herself within this world, itís within a solid cone of lightness: We always want to believe the best in others.
It doesnít last. Karl is terrified that the black family about to move into Bev and Russís house (the supple, homey design is by Daniel Ostling) will drive down property values and raise trouble for everyone, and implores the couple to reconsider. Heís doing it for the greater good, Karl insists, and donít Bev and Russ owe that to the neighborhood? But they arenít so sure that the debt theyíre supposed to repay is at all a positive one, and perceive - not without reason - that Karlís at-the-ready anger can be directed well below merely the color of someoneís skin.
At first, the second act seems to reverse the polarity. The neighborhood has blossomed, and is now where the young married couple Steve and Lindsey (Shamos and Parisse again) want to start their own family. For them, though, this means renovating the house - something the new homeownersí association, especially the foremost black couple (Dickinson and Gupton), arenít too keen on. Property values are still a concern, after all, but now thereís also the little matter of history, which some consider far more valuable than two new well-meaning whites down the block.
Norris communicates this in ways as subtle as Bevís underhanded attempts to dump off on others a chafing dish she doesnít want, as well in ways as obvious as a second-act joke-telling contest thatís all about who can best insult (and best be insulted by) a series of increasingly offensive jokes. Yet every instance derives naturally from the tension surrounding these seven people, which builds within each act and across the play as a whole. You never doubt, as you easily could, that these would all react just this well - or, as is more frequently the case, just this badly.
Much of this is thanks to MacKinnonís sparkling direction, which plays no favorites, and the cast of rigorously detailed comic actors. Only Kirk displays any real difficulty - neither the soon-to-shatter June Cleaver of the first act or the acid-outlooked Ally McBeal of the second come easily for her. But Shamos and Parisse are spectacular in their roles, the former gleefully controlling his under-the-surface slime and the latter a comic dream as two women unable to communicate for very different reasons; Wood is quietly touching and scarily unpredictable as a grieving father on the edge; and Dickinson and Gupton are deadpan perfection on both sides of the condescension sword thatís wielded so often.
You never sense Norris brandishing it, however. He never suggests that any of these people are relics to be mocked or victims to be pitied. The good and the evil can, and always have been, found in any time - it's the perspective of which is which that makes all the difference. The two become almost indistinguishable as the play and the charactersí uneasy peace unravel, and passing particular judgment against anyone for any reason is never possible for long.
Ultimately, Clybourne Park emerges as neither full-scale warning nor steaming satire, but a reminder that status never stays quo forever. The dream it chronicles is indeed deferred, as per the Langston Hughes poem that gave Hansberry her playís title, but itís not equality: itís post-racialism. For Norrisís characters, the playing field may have finally been leveled, but the attitudes are even rockier and colder than ever. Were they not so determined to live life on their own ironic terms, theyíd be inhabiting a grand tragedy rather than one of the seasonís insightful, enlivening comedies.