Broadway Reviews

God of Carnage
(Revisited)

Theatre Review by Matthew Murray - December 9, 2009

God of Carnage by Yasmina Reza. Translated by Christopher Hampton. Directed by Matthew Warchus. Scenic and costume design by Mark Thompson. Lighting design by Hugh Vanstone. Music by Gary Yershon. Sound design by Simon Baker/Christopher Cronin. Cast: Christine Lahti, Annie Potts, Jimmy Smits, and Ken Stott.
Theatre: Jacobs Theatre, 242 West 45th Street between Broadway and 8th Avenue
Running time: 90 minutes, with no intermission
Schedule: Tuesday at 7pm, Wednesday through Saturday at 8 pm, Wednesday and Saturday at 2 pm, Sunday at 3 pm.
Ticket prices: $66.50 - $251.50
Tickets: Telecharge

God of Carnage
Jimmy Smits, Annie Potts, Christine Lahti, and Ken Stott.
Photo by Joan Marcus.

Just because a playís outer light has dimmed doesnít mean itís not still illuminating. Thatís the lesson you must keep in mind with regards to God of Carnage, the violently domestic Yasmina Reza comedy (as translated by Christopher Hampton) thatís continuing its run at the Jacobs. It may have lost the four stars who were making it an event, but itís gained a new cast thatís working even harder to tell the story.

Thatís a difficult situation for any show today, particularly a new play on Broadway. The original cast was undeniably a producerís dream: Jeff Daniels, Hope Davis, James Gandolfini, and Marcia Gay Harden (who snagged a Tony Award), all of whom possessed glimmering screen credits in addition to more-than-satisfying theatre bona fides. To ensure success, director Matthew Warchus (who also earned a Tony) had little to do but establish the general premise, wind it up, and let it go.

Such is not exactly the case now. Christine Lahti, Annie Potts, and Jimmy Smits are no slouches in the name-wattage department, but - let's face it - don't outwardly compare in terms of drawing power. Nor do they provide as grandly gussied-up a starting point for the breakdown of orderly society that the play documents, the crisp sanity thatís just waiting for the ideal moment to dissolve into bickering, prop-throwing, and (in what remains one of the most memorable scenes) projectile vomiting.

The unavoidable fact is that seeing the show now is in no way the same experience as seeing it the first time. Which, letís be clear, is in no way a bad thing. Warchus and the showís producers have cannily avoided the typical trap of replacing biggest-name actors by not even attempting to fill the roles with analogs for the originals. And in spite of the ways itís stumbled - just a little bit - God of Carnage is stronger for the difference.

The first time around, the action seemed to sympathize with Daniels and Davisís characters, Alan and Annette Raleigh, who ventured to the Cobble Hill home of Michael and Veronica Novack to discuss the small matter of their son hitting the Novackís in the mouth with a stick. Alan, a suave lawyer, and Annette, a ďwealth manager,Ē set the tone for an evening in which the Raleighs would cascade down the hill of propriety and demolish practically everything in their wake - including the coarse-but-trying Michael and Veronica and, eventually, themselves.

Now, however, the polarity has flipped. As the Novacks, Lahti and Ken Stott (who originated the role of Michael in London) donít convey the idea theyíre trying to meet the Raleighs on their level but that theyíre already there by way of cunning charade. Every hint that the couple isnít exactly who they claim to be and each suggestion (whether stated or internalized) that they donít belong where they are has been magnified to imposing proportions. Rezaís subtle point that you can never put all your faith or trust in human nature comes through far more clearly in Lahtiís frazzled-from-the-start portrayal, which finds serenity as Veronicaís world implodes, than it did with Harden, who only gradually let us see the extent of her faÁade.

Smits and Potts themselves emanate more of a middle-class vibe than did Daniels and Davis, which partially defangs the earliest moments of the show in which Alan and Annette visibly condescend to Michael and Veronicaís urban naÔvetť. But this pays off new dividends as the play unfolds, showing them to be merely different kinds of pretenders from the Novacks. Alan and Annette are in no way better, theyíre just further along the path, which gives them more ammunition but also that much farther to fall when things turn sour. And when things curdle completely, these four are just as effective as their predecessors of communicating the breakdown of two marriages, four personalities, and the fictions on which existence is so often constructed.

Alanís relentless focus on his cell phone and smarmy meanderings around the law as he deals with a pharmaceutical clientís legal troubles do not come as natural to Smits as the moments of placating geniality, so Smits stumbles noticeably when heís not battling away at ground zero. This has a weakening but not debilitating effect, but is not exacerbated by Smitsís costars. Potts puts a frothy, neurotic spin on the homemaker-unwisely-turned-sophisticate Annette that gorgeously crumbles as their meeting careens; and Lahtiís dry-throated desperation makes Veronicaís pronouncements about everything from playground bullying to Darfur sound like a strangled - but nonetheless carefully calculated - cry for help.

Itís Stott, however, who represents both the biggest leap in characterization and is the productionís genuine find. Gandolfiniís Michael was thoughtful, almost cerebral, underscoring how he viewed every second of life according to a plan. Stottís, however, is thoroughly instinctual, cuddling a bottle of rum with a death grip, jumping without embarrassment into drunkenness, and justifying each of his pointed double-crosses and turnarounds as the most appropriate choice for that moment. This rampant unpredictability also makes Michael a lot funnier - Gandolfini approached the characterís many jokes gingerly from the front, but Stott plows under them from behind, knocking over everyone (including the audience) during his attack.

The character and his actor, then, are the perfect symbols for this repopulated production: earthy reality upending celestial dominance. No, you wonít be seeing exactly the production that opened in March. But this one is every bit as daring, original, and rewarding because Warchus and Reza have ensured that God of Carnage works just as well when youíre forced to pay full attention to the play rather as when you canít stop looking at the luminaries appearing in it.


Past Broadway Reviews

Terms of Service

[ © 1997 - 2014 www.TalkinBroadway.com, Inc. ]