Threaded Order Chronological Order
| re: Prince had the great accomplishment of quantity and quality | |
| Posted by: keikekaze 01:27 am EDT 10/23/17 | |
| In reply to: re: Prince had the great accomplishment of quantity and quality - CCentero 05:53 pm EDT 10/22/17 | |
|
|
|
| ??? I reproduced the IBDb list of Merrick's Broadway productions myself, in the post you're responding to here. I'm fully aware of what Merrick produced, and it's that awareness that fueled my original comment. As I've said repeatedly now, for someone who produced that many shows in that era of Broadway, Merrick did not have an ***extraordinary*** number of dire flops, and many of the Merrick productions that closed quickly were actually pretty good--or so the critics said. | |
| reply to this message |
| re: Prince had the great accomplishment of quantity and quality | |
| Last Edit: CCentero 10:52 am EDT 10/23/17 | |
| Posted by: CCentero 10:34 am EDT 10/23/17 | |
| In reply to: re: Prince had the great accomplishment of quantity and quality - keikekaze 01:27 am EDT 10/23/17 | |
|
|
|
| Nobody can argue with Merrick’s amazing success or willingness to put his money into importing successful UK shows. His record doesn’t need puffing by someone who doesn’t know what he/she is talking about. It’s clear that you’re not aware of what Merrick actually produced or how to deal in actual facts. I listed four dire flop musicals that completely contradict your theory of “pretty good to exceptional.” You need to read more about these shows and some of the other musicals that did make it to New York that weren’t “pretty good.” If you want to make a case that “The Baker’s Wife” is pretty good, fine, but then I'd be happy to add to the list with shows that Merrick ran on Broadway. A show that closes on opening night or soon thereafter is considered a flop, no matter how well intended, no matter who wrote it. Most musicals and plays that open on Broadway are well-intended. |
|
| reply to this message |
Time to render: 0.008808 seconds.