Threaded Order Chronological Order
| I wish there were more regional productions | |
| Posted by: Ann 12:01 pm EDT 10/25/17 | |
| In reply to: re: "All That Jazz" like it should be - NewsGuy 09:53 am EDT 10/25/17 | |
|
|
|
| ... now that it's available (and there's a high school version coming next year). Maybe it's too pricey for some companies. The listing at Samuel French cites: Chicago is a premier, high royalty title that requires further information to license. Following your application, your licensing representative will be in contact with you directly to determine pricing. Anyway, I'm really hoping to see a good regional production. It's new, so maybe next year. I've always been hesitant to see Chicago in New York, because there have been reports that the production has been uneven in quality over the past some-number of years. |
|
| reply to this message |
| re: I wish there were more regional productions | |
| Posted by: BroadwayTonyJ 10:38 am EDT 10/26/17 | |
| In reply to: I wish there were more regional productions - Ann 12:01 pm EDT 10/25/17 | |
|
|
|
| I saw the tour in '97 when it came to Chicago with Charlotte D'Amboise and Jasmine Guy. It was an excellent production. I saw it on Broadway in 2012 -- it was on a Monday night and there wasn't much else playing on that day that caught my interest -- plus I wanted to complete the cycle of seeing a show in every Broadway theatre. Unfortunately it was a rather tired performance even with Tony Yazbeck as Billy -- I'm glad I only paid for a rush ticket. | |
| reply to this message |
| re: I wish there were more regional productions | |
| Posted by: Quicheo 03:34 pm EDT 10/25/17 | |
| In reply to: I wish there were more regional productions - Ann 12:01 pm EDT 10/25/17 | |
|
|
|
| Me too! I work with several small theater companies out in the hinterlands and we have never been able to produce Chicago because of our proximity to touring houses. (We live in a college town.) For over 15 years, we have applied every year for a license and have been denied despite the fact that a national tour has NEVER played here--the producers have a blackout on any market where there could be a potential tour. Consequently, only professional productions (and the licensing is indeed steep) happen and occasionally a school show. |
|
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: I wish there were more regional productions | |
| Posted by: Ann 04:01 pm EDT 10/25/17 | |
| In reply to: re: I wish there were more regional productions - Quicheo 03:34 pm EDT 10/25/17 | |
|
|
|
| I may have been misinformed, but I didn't think the rights were available for anyone until recently. Or those restrictions are so restricting, no one produced it. I think I noticed the first regional production last year. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| CHICAGO in Chicago | |
| Posted by: BroadwayTonyJ 09:50 am EDT 10/26/17 | |
| In reply to: re: I wish there were more regional productions - Ann 04:01 pm EDT 10/25/17 | |
|
|
|
| Drury Lane Oakbrook recently did an outstanding production of the original '75 version of Chicago. It ran from April through June of this year. IMO it was much better than the current revival. It had an actual set -- I'm at work and don't have my Playbill with me, but there was an additional character (possibly an ex-cop or reporter) who serves as a narrator and commentator throughout the show. Some of the scenes were longer and there was at least one scene that was not in the '96 version which I've seen on tour and on Broadway. Prior to this production the only other time that Chicago was staged by a regional theater in my area (to my knowledge) was a production by Court Theatre (sometime in the early 90's) -- I didn't see it and I've tried googling it, but I can't find anything about it. |
|
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: CHICAGO in Chicago | |
| Posted by: Ann 11:38 am EDT 10/26/17 | |
| In reply to: CHICAGO in Chicago - BroadwayTonyJ 09:50 am EDT 10/26/17 | |
|
|
|
| I would have loved to have seen that production - I wonder if that was a special deal. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: CHICAGO in Chicago | |
| Posted by: BroadwayTonyJ 12:33 pm EDT 10/26/17 | |
| In reply to: re: CHICAGO in Chicago - Ann 11:38 am EDT 10/26/17 | |
|
|
|
| I was told that it took years of negotiations to secure permission to do the '75 version. In addition the family that owns and operates Drury Lane has a strong connection with a lot of Broadway producers. They have on many occasions rented the sets and costumes from recently closed Broadway shows and used them in their productions. I actually was not aware they were staging the '75 version of Chicago until late in the run. I think I did post about the production after I saw it, but it was probably too late for anyone from out of town to plan a trip to see it. I know it's been nominated for the 2017 Best Musical Jeff Award, although competition is pretty intense this year. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: I wish there were more regional productions | |
| Posted by: Snowysdad 07:32 am EDT 10/26/17 | |
| In reply to: re: I wish there were more regional productions - Ann 04:01 pm EDT 10/25/17 | |
|
|
|
| One of our community theaters produced it several years ago (5 possibly 6). Maybe stock rights were available a long time ago then were pulled. I know rights for professional productions were and are available as I performed in it 2002 or 2003. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: I wish there were more regional productions | |
| Posted by: Michael_Portantiere 02:34 pm EDT 10/25/17 | |
| In reply to: I wish there were more regional productions - Ann 12:01 pm EDT 10/25/17 | |
|
|
|
| "Chicago is a premier, high royalty title that requires further information to license." Does anyone have any info on what this means, and why this show it categorized this way? What are some other shows that fall into the same category? |
|
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
Time to render: 0.022444 seconds.