Threaded Order Chronological Order
| re: Boxes at "Hamilton," partial view; good enough? | |
| Posted by: Delvino 07:19 pm EST 12/21/17 | |
| In reply to: re: Boxes at "Hamilton," partial view; good enough? - gad90210 06:36 pm EST 12/21/17 | |
|
|
|
| Not to put too fine a point on it: H would be higher, looking down, but the right/left angle is approximately the same? Huge chunks of the show (upstage corners) aren't missing; it's a question of the vertical distance atop the performance? Believe me, I'm just happy to get a seat that is closer to the apron than the rear mezz. Actually, just happy to have a seat for about two hundred bucks. They are so scarce before late August. | |
| reply to this message |
| It's a great deal for $200! | |
| Posted by: gad90210 08:30 pm EST 12/21/17 | |
| In reply to: re: Boxes at "Hamilton," partial view; good enough? - Delvino 07:19 pm EST 12/21/17 | |
|
|
|
| Plus, the leg room is great. That's hard to say at the Richard Rodgers. I don't know if this link will work, but it's a view from Box G. I think the view from H would be a bit better. https://aviewfrommyseat.com/photo/79923/Richard+Rodgers+Theatre/section-Box+G/row-1/seat-1/ |
|
| reply to this message |
| Just found it on "A view from my seat" | |
| Last Edit: Delvino 08:27 pm EST 12/21/17 | |
| Posted by: Delvino 08:26 pm EST 12/21/17 | |
| In reply to: re: Boxes at "Hamilton," partial view; good enough? - Delvino 07:19 pm EST 12/21/17 | |
|
|
|
| I saw H 4, (I bought H1) and it looks swell. Yes, you're on top of the actors. But there are worse places to be in NYC than atop the Hamilton company. I'm delighted, and again, for the price, to be so close... | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
Time to render: 0.009231 seconds.