Threaded Order Chronological Order
| WHOA. (plus a question on Ms. Channing's voice) | |
| Posted by: GrumpyMorningBoy 12:37 pm EST 01/10/18 | |
| In reply to: Sutton Foster as 'DOLLY'? ... - flaguy 11:17 am EST 01/10/18 | |
|
|
|
| I guess I never did the math. I should have. I had no idea Channing was so young. How did she sound like she'd been smoking five packs a day for thirty years?? I just did a little googling; there's some hubbub here and there that she'd had a 'throat injury' as a child that affected her voice. Anyone know the real story there? Meanwhile, I think Sutton Foster could be positively winning Dolly. Although she 'reads' as younger -- as made evident on her hit TV show -- I do think she'd keep the show playing into a longer run. A win for all concerned, if you ask me. - GMB |
|
| reply to this message |
| Foster will look about 35 in the role. If that. | |
| Last Edit: Delvino 08:17 pm EST 01/10/18 | |
| Posted by: Delvino 08:15 pm EST 01/10/18 | |
| In reply to: WHOA. (plus a question on Ms. Channing's voice) - GrumpyMorningBoy 12:37 pm EST 01/10/18 | |
|
|
|
| I'm sorry, but I find this rather odd. We have enough ageism in the industry as a whole. Most older actresses have difficult finding decent roles. Dolly can be played by anyone, reading 50 - 70 something. Why give this part to a woman who could read younger than Irene? She's now playing a character on TV who passes for a woman in her 20s. On stage, Foster will look up to Irene as the older adult in the room. Dolly is endearing because she's gorgeous and a catch but -- by the standards of her day -- (almost) run out of options. If she's 43 in 2018's casting, reading 35, we've succumbed to more ageism, the pernicious other side of the equation: viewing "older" once again as a woman over 35. The great thing about Peter is she's precisely the right age, and appears as sexy as she always did. It makes her winning a new spouse beautiful and moving. Because she's to vital and viable. I don't want a young Dolly. |
|
| reply to this message |
| re: Foster will look about 35 in the role. If that. | |
| Posted by: Cabfan 11:37 am EST 01/11/18 | |
| In reply to: Foster will look about 35 in the role. If that. - Delvino 08:15 pm EST 01/10/18 | |
|
|
|
| "I don't want a young Dolly." Are you thinking that younger women cannot adequately portray widows? The history of the era (or should that be herstory) says that women were of three ages: youth, married, widowed. Mrs. Levy and Mrs. Malloy were of the same age -- both widows -- no matter what their chronological ages. As background, read Pride and Prejudice for married women outranking older single women, and Gone with the Wind for a young widow being frowned on for wanting to "get some fun back into my life." Even today in some countries, widows are socially prescribed to wear certain clothing and to act... well... widowly. I rank the requirements of a good Dolly as: (1) able to find the comedy, (2) able to find the pathos, and (3) singing. If the first two are there, the singing is not as important. Almost all Dolly's songs start with her and then have the chorus come in to give the song a rousing finish. I know a woman from a South Asian country who was thrilled when her parents started arranging a marriage for her. As a single woman, she was not allowed to go many places, and when she did get to go she had to be accompanied by her father or brother. She looked at marriage as "freedom". Yet widows in that country rarely remarry, and are expected to wear specific dress. Speaking of South Asia, I've always wanted to see a Hello Dolly production cast entirely with South Asians. It sort of fits with Dolly as a marriage broker (arranged marriages), South Asian traditions for widows, and the big chorus numbers would look great with saris and Punjabis! |
|
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
Time to render: 0.013410 seconds.