LOG IN / REGISTER




re: Sutton Foster as 'DOLLY'? ...
Posted by: BruceinIthaca 02:28 pm EST 01/10/18
In reply to: re: Sutton Foster as 'DOLLY'? ... - donnyboy 01:49 pm EST 01/10/18

I also think to have a Dolly who appears as youthful as Foster does, you would need also to cast a younger Irene (and possibly Cornelius) than Kate Baldwin. I thought Baldwin was absolutely wonderful in the production, but she does read mid- to late 30s (and she is, according to her IBDB page in her early 40s). Eileen Brennan, who always read a little older than her actual age back then, was 32 to Channing's 43. I did not see that production (though wish I had as I love 'em both--saw Channing do Dolly in 94 to Florence Lacey's matronly, but beautifully sung Irene). I think some age difference between Dolly and Irene is important to the dynamics of the plot. Otherwise, Dolly "styling" for a codger like Horace feels off--as it did with Streisand, though they did their best with costuming, etc. to suggest some
reply

Previous: re: Sutton Foster as 'DOLLY'? ... - donnyboy 01:49 pm EST 01/10/18
Next: re: Sutton Foster as 'DOLLY'? ... - Michael_Portantiere 03:48 pm EST 01/10/18
Thread:

Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.007511 seconds.