Threaded Order Chronological Order
| re: Flirting with the audience? | |
| Posted by: DRNY 03:39 pm EST 01/22/18 | |
| In reply to: Flirting with the audience? - aleck 10:33 am EST 01/22/18 | |
|
|
|
| I agree. The added choreography for him in "Dancin" was his best moment. It was an one dimensional performance way over the top with only one facial expression. Wide eyed and wide smiled. I hope he finds his way with the role because right now he appears somewhat dimwitted and not pleasing to watch. Naturally talented just misses with his take on Barnaby. | |
| reply to this message |
| re: Flirting with the audience? | |
| Posted by: JereNYC (JereNYC@aol.com) 04:28 pm EST 01/22/18 | |
| In reply to: re: Flirting with the audience? - DRNY 03:39 pm EST 01/22/18 | |
|
|
|
| I wonder if that's due to a lack of rehearsal process? I have heard people say similar things of Peters and Garber and the new Minnie, whose name escapes me(that the performances aren't quite there yet), and it makes me wonder how much rehearsal they got and if Jerry Zaks was part of the process at all. | |
| reply to this message |
| re: Flirting with the audience? | |
| Posted by: garyd 07:50 pm EST 01/23/18 | |
| In reply to: re: Flirting with the audience? - JereNYC 04:28 pm EST 01/22/18 | |
|
|
|
| Zaks definitely worked with Peters and Garber. I don't know about Stemp or Griggs. Carlyle must have worked with Stemp. There was at least one sitzprobe and there were rehearsals of the major production numbers. However, for all I know, Saturday night may have been, for all intents and purposes, the dress rehearsal. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
Time to render: 0.013281 seconds.