Threaded Order Chronological Order
| re: I guess Reece Shearsmith would only be able to do maybe three months if he transfers...... | |
| Posted by: sampos 01:04 pm EST 02/09/18 | |
| In reply to: re: I guess Reece Shearsmith would only be able to do maybe three months if he transfers...... - mikem 11:04 am EST 02/09/18 | |
|
|
|
| The Parisian Woman may not be eligible for some reason. It was not listed as eligible during the most recent ruling. See link below. Don't know why this hasn't been mentioned outright, unless they're trying to just sweep it under the rug. Maybe Riedel knows for certain it isn't eligible. | |
| Link | http://www.playbill.com/article/tony-awards-administration-committee-determines-eligibility-for-the-bands-visit-spongebob-squarepants-and-more |
| reply to this message | |
| re: I guess Reece Shearsmith would only be able to do maybe three months if he transfers...... | |
| Last Edit: sirpupnyc 01:22 pm EST 02/09/18 | |
| Posted by: sirpupnyc 01:20 pm EST 02/09/18 | |
| In reply to: re: I guess Reece Shearsmith would only be able to do maybe three months if he transfers...... - sampos 01:04 pm EST 02/09/18 | |
|
|
|
| Edit: Never mind... | |
| reply to this message |
| re: I guess Reece Shearsmith would only be able to do maybe three months if he transfers...... | |
| Posted by: Thom915 01:17 pm EST 02/09/18 | |
| In reply to: re: I guess Reece Shearsmith would only be able to do maybe three months if he transfers...... - sampos 01:04 pm EST 02/09/18 | |
|
|
|
| Playbill strikes again. If one goes to the Tony Awards Administration site, the Parisian Woman is indeed the tenth one discussed at that meeting. Had it not been eligible, that would have been listed in the determinations. | |
| Link | https://www.tonyawards.com/en_US/news/articles/2018-01-25/2018-01-25_tony_awards_eligibility_for_2018_part_2.html |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: I guess Reece Shearsmith would only be able to do maybe three months if he transfers...... | |
| Posted by: sirpupnyc 01:25 pm EST 02/09/18 | |
| In reply to: re: I guess Reece Shearsmith would only be able to do maybe three months if he transfers...... - Thom915 01:17 pm EST 02/09/18 | |
|
|
|
| It says so now, but it was indeed missing from the release as distributed on the day. (Which Playbill should have questioned before publishing, sure, but it's Slate or the Tony's omission.) | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| It is listed on the Tony Awards website | |
| Posted by: barberg 01:16 pm EST 02/09/18 | |
| In reply to: re: I guess Reece Shearsmith would only be able to do maybe three months if he transfers...... - sampos 01:04 pm EST 02/09/18 | |
|
|
|
| The Tony website says it was considered at the last meeting. There were no rulings related to it. So it should be eligible. Maybe it was inadvertently omitted from an early press release that was never corrected? |
|
| Link | From the Tony website |
| reply to this message | reply to first message | |
| re: It is listed on the Tony Awards website | |
| Posted by: sampos 01:35 pm EST 02/09/18 | |
| In reply to: It is listed on the Tony Awards website - barberg 01:16 pm EST 02/09/18 | |
|
|
|
| Thanks for this clarification, was not aware of the release on the tony site. Yes it seems the show was omitted from an earlier press release and the Tony site was updated with it. It's not just Playbill's error as Broadwayworld as well still has the same earlier press release up. Though in addition, Springsteen was not made eligible either, but that was to be expected despite some rumblings of the opposite. |
|
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
Time to render: 0.017033 seconds.