LOG IN / REGISTER



Threaded Order Chronological Order

re: Could the original have run longer with bigger star replacements?
Posted by: AlanScott 06:30 pm EDT 06/24/18
In reply to: re: Could the original have run longer with bigger star replacements? - Michael_Portantiere 04:31 pm EDT 06/21/18

I wouldn't be surprised if Sweeney is now generally getting more productions than Forum, which it seems some people find objectionable and basically unfunny nowadays. Which is very sad to me, since I totally love Forum, but it does need to be done very well, despite what Sondheim said long ago about it working in even high school productions. But I think there are people who would find even the most brilliant production of Forum coarse, sexist, misogynist and unfunny. (Truth is that it did not get universal raves even in 1962.) Of course, it is somewhat coarse, although in a sort of refined way (if that's possible), but I don't find it at all sexist and/or misogynist. And I sure find it funny, at least when it's done well.

In fact, at the moment MTI lists 10 upcoming productions of Forum and 25 upcoming productions of Sweeney.
reply to this message


re: Could the original have run longer with bigger star replacements?
Posted by: Chazwaza 08:08 pm EDT 06/24/18
In reply to: re: Could the original have run longer with bigger star replacements? - AlanScott 06:30 pm EDT 06/24/18

I think the book is bawdy and the score is tuneful and witty... I think many people didn't find them to be the perfect match. I think the show as a whole is wonderful. But I don't think Sondheim's score is very coarse at all, maybe to a fault. Though clearly not since it was met with a lot of success when they combined the book and score.

I don't know what people these days think, but I've always heard and agreed that the Forum book is one of the best musical books out there.
reply to this message


Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.007108 seconds.