LOG IN / REGISTER



Threaded Order Chronological Order

re: anyone see it without Anita Morris?
Posted by: bowtie7 06:39 pm EDT 06/25/18
In reply to: re: anyone see it without Anita Morris? - jwilson 02:28 pm EDT 06/25/18

There was a photo in the souvenir program of William Ivey Long and the swings--each of which had their own individual costume. I believe the idea was that they could could go on for various roles in a costume just for them, though I am surprised that the Carla understudy did not have a duplicate of what became the shows signature look.
reply to this message


Here is a New York Times article on the Anita Morris understudy situation
Posted by: bobby2 11:15 pm EDT 06/25/18
In reply to: re: anyone see it without Anita Morris? - bowtie7 06:39 pm EDT 06/25/18

Criswell did wear her own costume but then after complaints they hired somebody else to cover the role.
Link https://www.nytimes.com/1983/03/09/theater/stage-absenteeism-said-to-be-rising.html
reply to this message


re: Here is a New York Times article on the Anita Morris understudy situation
Posted by: bowtie7 10:03 am EDT 06/26/18
In reply to: Here is a New York Times article on the Anita Morris understudy situation - bobby2 11:15 pm EDT 06/25/18

corrected link
Link https://www.nytimes.com/1983/03/09/theater/stage-absenteeism-said-to-be-rising.html
reply to this message | reply to first message


re: Here is a New York Times article on the Anita Morris understudy situation
Posted by: jwilson 11:45 pm EDT 06/25/18
In reply to: Here is a New York Times article on the Anita Morris understudy situation - bobby2 11:15 pm EDT 06/25/18

Thank you for linking that article. Another major theatregoing disappointment was not seeing Elizabeth Ashley in Agnes of God. I guess I was fortunate, though, to see Carrie Fisher and only one of the two performances that Ashley missed! So the complaints about absenteeism go back at least to the 1980s.
reply to this message | reply to first message


Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.010746 seconds.