LOG IN / REGISTER



Threaded Order Chronological Order

re: Arthur Laurents
Posted by: royscho 04:59 pm EDT 07/12/18
In reply to: re: Arthur Laurents - winters 03:34 pm EDT 07/12/18

OK. Fine. So what is the point of your post? What did you mean by saying "Do we really think that Mr. Laurents would be excited by a re-imagination of WSS?"

If you wrote something along the lines of "I don't think Mr. Laurents would have liked a new interpretation" I would not have responded (even though I disagree - I think he wanted new approaches but he was very critical about most people's work.) But your wording make it sound like a rebuke about the fact that there's a new interpretation and that's (probably) against Laurents' wishes or approval. And then you ask us if *we* really think he would be excited about it, as if *we* have something to do with the decision.
reply to this message


re: Arthur Laurents
Posted by: Michael_Portantiere 05:17 pm EDT 07/12/18
In reply to: re: Arthur Laurents - royscho 04:59 pm EDT 07/12/18

I think it's fair to say indications are (were) that Laurents would not like any new interpretation of WEST SIDE STORY that wasn't supervised by him. The last Broadway revival (or revisal), which he directed, was in many ways a new interpretation from a directorial standpoint, even in not in terms of the actual text (except for the Spanish lyrics, which eventually were largely eliminated) or the choreography and the orchestrations.

P.S. My feeling is that, regardless of how much I personally like or dislike a radical new interpretation of a classic play or musical, I always find radical new interpretations easier to take if the show has been frequently revived in more or less traditional stagings. SWEENEY TODD is an example that leaps immediately to mind, and also OKLAHOMA!
reply to this message


Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.007134 seconds.