| re: Arthur Laurents |
| Posted by: royscho 04:59 pm EDT 07/12/18 |
| In reply to: re: Arthur Laurents - winters 03:34 pm EDT 07/12/18 |
|
OK. Fine. So what is the point of your post? What did you mean by saying "Do we really think that Mr. Laurents would be excited by a re-imagination of WSS?"
If you wrote something along the lines of "I don't think Mr. Laurents would have liked a new interpretation" I would not have responded (even though I disagree - I think he wanted new approaches but he was very critical about most people's work.) But your wording make it sound like a rebuke about the fact that there's a new interpretation and that's (probably) against Laurents' wishes or approval. And then you ask us if *we* really think he would be excited about it, as if *we* have something to do with the decision. |
|
reply
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Arthur Laurents - winters 03:34 pm EDT 07/12/18 |
| Next: |
re: Arthur Laurents - Michael_Portantiere 05:17 pm EDT 07/12/18 |
| Thread: |
|
