LOG IN / REGISTER




re: "Literally"
Posted by: BruceinIthaca 10:01 am EDT 07/16/18
In reply to: "Literally" - MockingbirdGirl 10:33 pm EDT 07/15/18

Actually, now it does. I listened to the "Hidden Brain" podcast on language and John McWhorter, the noted linguist at Columbia University, explained that the word is now an example of a contronym--a word that has two opposite meanings. Popular usage ultimately determines meaning. I certainly have always thought "literally" was not acceptable as an intensifier or qualifier, but, per McWhorter (who is a smart scholar), it now is. Usage outweighs origin or prescription.
reply

Previous: re: Can we stop already????? - whereismikeyfl 08:26 am EDT 07/17/18
Next: re: "Literally" - Budinsky 07:32 pm EDT 07/16/18
Thread:

Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.021999 seconds.