Threaded Order Chronological Order
| re: I think musicals bring something new to the table | |
| Posted by: Zelgo 01:07 pm EST 11/29/18 | |
| In reply to: I think musicals bring something new to the table - dramedy 12:51 pm EST 11/29/18 | |
|
|
|
| So glad you brought up Festen, which was over a decade ago, I think. It was literally one of the worst experiences I've ever had in the theatre. While Mockingbird claims to go to the source material, I find that "we're going back to the source material for a darker view of the story," to be typical producer marketing talk to justify a money grab based on the public's feelings about a movie. |
|
| reply to this message |
| Mockingbird supposedly is due to child actors | |
| Posted by: dramedy 01:17 pm EST 11/29/18 | |
| In reply to: re: I think musicals bring something new to the table - Zelgo 01:07 pm EST 11/29/18 | |
|
|
|
| Not being able to the material on stage. Frankly, I don’t buy that but it does make it easier for 8 shows a week to use adults. | |
| reply to this message |
| re: I think musicals bring something new to the table | |
| Posted by: sirpupnyc 01:17 pm EST 11/29/18 | |
| In reply to: re: I think musicals bring something new to the table - Zelgo 01:07 pm EST 11/29/18 | |
|
|
|
| Yeah..."But it's based on the original book, not the movie" is one of the biggest cliches now. The discussion in the Prince thread this morning had me wondering if the instigator of a piece makes a difference. If a musical based on a movie is made because a theatre writer says "This inspires me, I can make something bigger of it" vs. Universal or Sony or whoever saying "A musical adaptation will bring us money." I think it must, but probably not entirely. Inspired writers don't necessarily make successful work, and corporate-driven adaptations don't all end badly. Have any of those "We're making a musical! Writers and creative team TBD" announcements every led to good shows? |
|
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
Time to render: 0.008907 seconds.