Threaded Order Chronological Order
| re: Harold Prince:I refer you all to the documentary 'Behind the Mask' | |
| Posted by: fosse76 02:09 pm EST 12/03/18 | |
| In reply to: re: Harold Prince:I refer you all to the documentary 'Behind the Mask' - ryhog 12:57 pm EST 12/03/18 | |
|
|
|
| All work created before 1924 were in the public domain by in the 1970s. The 1976 Copyright Law overhauled copyright protections. Even if new material had been added, the "original" would be in the public domain. There is nothing in Title 17 (that I could find) that extends the length of protection due to changes in the protected work. | |
| reply to this message |
| re: Harold Prince:I refer you all to the documentary 'Behind the Mask' | |
| Posted by: ryhog 03:02 pm EST 12/03/18 | |
| In reply to: re: Harold Prince:I refer you all to the documentary 'Behind the Mask' - fosse76 02:09 pm EST 12/03/18 | |
|
|
|
| yes. I was just laying out every possible scenario that came to mind. In order for the copyright date to have been different than 1910, the song would have to have been written later and added to the opera (or not). Regarding UK vs US mentioned in the next post, the former has shorter duration (70 years) because Disney was not able to buy a piece of legislation in parliament the way it was in the US Congress. In any case, a song published in 1910 would be in the public domain in both countries. | |
| reply to this message |
| re: Harold Prince:I refer you all to the documentary 'Behind the Mask' | |
| Posted by: showtunetrivia 02:46 pm EST 12/03/18 | |
| In reply to: re: Harold Prince:I refer you all to the documentary 'Behind the Mask' - fosse76 02:09 pm EST 12/03/18 | |
|
|
|
| But British and American coptright laws are different, as Maury Yeston found out with his PHANTOM. Laura |
|
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
Time to render: 0.011995 seconds.