Really, why are you posting basically the same thing in reply to me that you posted a few days ago, and I responded to that post of yours (which was not in reply to a post of mine) with a very long and detailed reply? I refer you to your earlier post, which is linked, and my earlier reply is easy to find from there.
I really can't figure out what you are trying to accomplish with your post here since you posted it specifically in response to my post, and I said nothing about Lerner in my post. It's like a belated reply to my reply to your Day Before Spring reply post, but posted in a different place and with nothing substantive to say. Just a way for you to perhaps indirectly say, "Nothing you said the other day has made me change my mind about Lerner." If that was your intent, I wasn't trying to get you to change your mind about Lerner. I just thought that if you were going to dismiss Lerner, you should get things right and display a more thorough and accurate knowledge of the work you were dismissing. |
