LOG IN / REGISTER



Threaded Order Chronological Order

I think Glenn is the only guarantee at this point
Posted by: dramedy 08:45 pm EST 02/28/19
In reply to: an inconsistent stage director doing this as his FIRST film? big risk, probable mistake - Chazwaza 08:08 pm EST 02/28/19

A lot can happen between now and October with the rest of casting and even possible new dieector. It’s not the first time a director is replaced even midstream—Star Wars: Solo anyone.
reply to this message


re: I think Glenn is the only guarantee at this point
Posted by: MockingbirdGirl 09:46 pm EST 02/28/19
In reply to: I think Glenn is the only guarantee at this point - dramedy 08:45 pm EST 02/28/19

It’s not the first time a director is replaced even midstream—Star Wars: Solo anyone.

Errr... hardly a success story:
Link Solo Is Officially the First Star Wars Movie to Flop
reply to this message


World gross was $400m
Posted by: dramedy 09:58 pm EST 02/28/19
In reply to: re: I think Glenn is the only guarantee at this point - MockingbirdGirl 09:46 pm EST 02/28/19

But budget was $270m and part of that was switching directors.
reply to this message | reply to first message


re: World gross was $400m
Last Edit: MockingbirdGirl 10:27 pm EST 02/28/19
Posted by: MockingbirdGirl 10:26 pm EST 02/28/19
In reply to: World gross was $400m - dramedy 09:58 pm EST 02/28/19

Budget was $275m and it only made $213m domestically. Flop.

By contrast, Rogue One cost $200m and made $532 domestically.

I reiterate: Hardly a stellar example of the wonders that can be worked by switching directors mid-picture.
reply to this message | reply to first message


Of course with movies .....
Posted by: jdm 10:55 am EST 03/01/19
In reply to: re: World gross was $400m - MockingbirdGirl 10:26 pm EST 02/28/19

there are any after-in-the-theaters venues to make money - DVDs, fios on demand, Netflix, then sold to the various cable stations. Many theatrical movie flops end up making money.

Jim
reply to this message | reply to first message


re: World gross was $400m
Posted by: dramedy 12:50 am EST 03/01/19
In reply to: re: World gross was $400m - MockingbirdGirl 10:26 pm EST 02/28/19

Movie theater gross is only a portion of final tally with tv rights, dvd sales and every other way Disney sells products. Something s broadway show doesn’t enjoy nearly as much without further investment.

The vanity fair article was written a week after release. Yes, it was a disappointment compared to other Star Wars movies. But it will be a money maker. I do wonder if the director wasn’t replaced with Ron Howard what a mess would have been released. And switching directors probably added to the final costs. But the point is, the sunset director could be replaced with a more seasoned movie director.
reply to this message | reply to first message


re: World gross was $400m
Posted by: Michael_Portantiere 11:05 pm EST 02/28/19
In reply to: re: World gross was $400m - MockingbirdGirl 10:26 pm EST 02/28/19

"Hardly a stellar example of the wonders that can be worked by switching directors mid-picture."

I don't think anyone wrote anything about how wonders can be worked by changing directors mid-picture. The only point made here was that it has happened before. But if you do want an example of how wonders can be worked by changing directors mid-picture, that example is BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY.
reply to this message | reply to first message


re: World gross was $400m
Posted by: 15minutecall 09:38 am EST 03/01/19
In reply to: re: World gross was $400m - Michael_Portantiere 11:05 pm EST 02/28/19

Singer wasn’t replaced for artistic reasons. Dexter Fletcher was brought in to film the last bit of Bohemian Rhapsody and did very little in post. John Ottman won the Oscar for editing in large part because he carried the film to the finish line, as he did with most Singer films even when he did do all the shooting. Fletcher didn’t really put his mark on the film.
reply to this message | reply to first message


Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.020364 seconds.