LOG IN / REGISTER



Threaded Order Chronological Order

re: NYT: "Too Flimsy To Fly" re Kate Baldwin
Posted by: jjhbb340 12:28 pm EST 03/01/19
In reply to: re: NYT: "Too Flimsy To Fly" re Kate Baldwin - NewtonUK 11:56 am EST 03/01/19

She is a wonderful actress with a beautiful voice.She was amazing in the revival of John and Jen a few years back. This past holiday season I was waiting on the 34th st platform for an express train-she was only a few feet away so I did something I never did before,walked over to her and told her how much I admire her work.She could not have been more gracious! Told her I had seen her with all 3 Dollys many times over,and all her other great performances. We discussed this new show which I'm seeing this month-know she'll be brilliant as always!
reply to this message


Her definitive Irene Molloy was actually a career high, one might argue.
Posted by: Delvino 09:23 am EST 03/02/19
In reply to: re: NYT: "Too Flimsy To Fly" re Kate Baldwin - jjhbb340 12:28 pm EST 03/01/19

Baldwin and Creel were such a critical component of the "Dolly" success, it's unfair to have her participation reductively characterized as Green did. Yes, it's a star vehicle for a woman named Dolly. But the production proved it's really a show about the lives that intersect in one vivid day. When Peters took over, the Irene-Dolly relationship had a special vibe that made them feel like true peers, as businesswomen and otherwise. I thought Irene became even more valuable to the "Dolly" storytelling, and needless to say, Baldwin was the strongest I've seen. And I've seen stellar Irene Molloys.
reply to this message


re: Her definitive Irene Molloy was actually a career high, one might argue.
Posted by: KingSpeed 10:24 pm EST 03/03/19
In reply to: Her definitive Irene Molloy was actually a career high, one might argue. - Delvino 09:23 am EST 03/02/19

Yep. I thought of her for Malloy the moment they announced the production. Obviously they did too. Her voice is made for “Ribbons Down My Back.”
reply to this message | reply to first message


Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.009056 seconds.