| re: "Whose Production is it anyway?": violating Copyright in Theatre | |
| Last Edit: whereismikeyfl 09:36 pm EDT 06/16/19 | |
| Posted by: whereismikeyfl 09:35 pm EDT 06/16/19 | |
| In reply to: re: "Whose Production is it anyway?": violating Copyright in Theatre - vegas 09:23 pm EDT 06/16/19 | |
|
|
|
| Courts have not rejected the use of video. What they have rejected is the very idea of a director having copyright. This has been so widely covered, that you can google a dozen articles. You can even google any of the cases mentioned in this thread--even the ones that settled--and you will find that there is no IP for directors. The Einhorn Tam Lin case is probably the best known because it worked deeper into the legal system than most. There have been cases (notably the Urintown suits) where producers have claimed ownership of the staging. But that has gotten less attention because the usual interest is in the director maintaining rights. |
|
| reply | |
|
|
|
| Previous: | re: "Whose Production is it anyway?": violating Copyright in Theatre - vegas 09:23 pm EDT 06/16/19 |
| Next: | re: "Whose Production is it anyway?": violating Copyright in Theatre - vegas 09:53 pm EDT 06/16/19 |
| Thread: |
|
Time to render: 0.032324 seconds.