| re: Whats interesting to me about 'the naming game' |
| Posted by: ryhog 05:20 pm EDT 06/19/19 |
| In reply to: re: Whats interesting to me about 'the naming game' - NewtonUK 03:19 pm EDT 06/19/19 |
|
"it strikes me as an insult to the man (and his wife) . . . A fact¨
Lots to untangle here:
"Insult" is a personal offense, so one person cannot assess how another person is affected by something, at least unless they claim some personal pipeline to that person's ego.
You cannot "insult" a person when they or their representatives have authorized the putative "insult."
Can you insult a dead person? (I think not but this highlights the fucked up nature of how the copyright laws in their present form prompt entitlements that are ill-founded.)
It is a fact who wrote what. It is not a fact that a form of branding that corporate-minded rightsholders conclude is in their best interests, is an insult. |
|
reply
|
|
| Previous: |
"Rodgers and Hart's as a moniker only covers music & lyrics"... - Dawson 08:47 pm EDT 06/19/19 |
| Next: |
I would imagine that Lindsay and Crouse would take issue with your first sentence. (NM) - Seth Christenfeld 04:10 pm EDT 06/19/19 |
| Thread: |
|
